Mosdos Chofetz Chaim, Inc. v. Village of Wesley Hills et al.

Filing 70

OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated herein, the claims of Plaintiffs Mosdos and YCC are dismissed in their entirety. The claims by the Individual Plaintiffs against the Individual Defendants in their individual capacity also are dismissed, as a re the claims against Sanderson and Marshall in theirofficial capacity, though without prejudice. To the extent Plaintiffs are challenging the Village Defendants' zoning regulations and laws, those claims are dismissed. Plaintiffs' claims a gainst the Pomona Defendants under the New York State Constitution are dismissed without prejudice. The motions to dismiss are denied in all other respects. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motions. (Dkt. Nos. 52 a nd 55.) Motions terminated: 55 CROSS MOTION to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. filed by Herbert I. Marshall, Nicholas L. Sanderson, The Village of Pomona, 52 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint. filed by Jeffrey Oppenheim, Howard L. Cohen, Jay B. Rosenstein, Edward B. McPherson, Robert I. Rhodes, The Village of Montebello, Jerome Kobre, The Village of Chestnut Ridge, Kathryn Ellsworth, David A. Goldsmith, The Village of Wesley Hills, Robert H. Frankel. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 9/26/2011) (rj)

Download PDF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?