Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. v. Spirit of Utah Wilderness, Inc.

Filing 277

ORDER VACATING WARRANT AND DIRECTING RELEASE. The Court orders the following: The Court VACATES the warrant for Mr. Salt's arrest and the order entered on January 22, 2020 (ECF No. 171); The Court ORDERS the release of Mr. Salt from the cus tody of the US Marshals Service, subject to any other warrants or outstanding detainers; Mr. Salt SHALL purge as he agreed to in his letter, as described above; The parties are DIRECTED to file a formal consent order reflecting Mr. Salt's agre ement to purge, as indicated hereto, within 7 days of Mr. Salt's release from custody. In the consent order, the parties are directed to provide a reasonable timeline by which Mr. Salt shall provide documentation regarding his inability to pay his contempt fines. Mr. Salt is reminded that he has agreed to vest the Court with ongoing jurisdiction to enforce his obligations to purge his contempt, as reflected in the Court's prior orders. (See ECF Nos. 135, 160, 171, 250.) The Court w arns that Mr. Salt may be subject to future orders of imprisonment should he fail to purge and comply pursuant to this Order and the forthcoming consent Order. The Court directs defense counsel to personally serve and deliver a copy of this order to Mr. Salt and show proof of service on the docket. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 2/22/23) (yv) Modified on 2/23/2023 (yv).

Download PDF
Case 7:10-cv-01136-NSR Document 277 Filed 02/22/23 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------X : WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC., : : Plaintiff, : -against: : : SPIRIT OF UTAH WILDERNESS, INC., : d/b/a GREAT SALT LAKEKEEPER, or : GREAT SALT LAKE WATER KEEPERS, : Defendant. : ---------------------------------------------------------------X NELSON S. ROMÁN, United States District Judge: 2/22/2023 10-cv-1136 (NSR) ORDER VACATING WARRANT AND DIRECTING RELEASE Plaintiff Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) commenced this action on February 11, 2010 asserting claims against Defendant Spirit of Utah Wilderness, Inc. (“SUW” or “Defendant”) and its officers for, inter alia, trademark infringement. On May 8, 2015, the Court issued a Default Judgment and Order (ECF No. 100), after the Court found that Defendant had infringed upon Plaintiff’s marks. On January 22, 2020, the Court issued an order of imprisonment (ECF No. 171) following Jeffrey Salt’s (“Mr. Salt”) failure to comply with the Court’s contempt orders (ECF Nos. 135, 160, 171). Despite numerous extensions on his time to purge, (see ECF Nos. 183, 187, 189, 194, 201, 205, 209, 213, 218, 225, 227, 231, 234, & 239), Mr. Salt still failed to purge, and the Court subsequently issued an arrest warrant and delivered it to the US Marshals Service, which went into effect on April 27, 2022. (See ECF Nos. 250, 263.) On January 20, 2023, the Court issued and delivered an amended arrest warrant directing the US Marshals Service in the District of Utah to effectuate the warrant, because as to the Court’s understanding, Mr. Salt’s last known Case 7:10-cv-01136-NSR Document 277 Filed 02/22/23 Page 2 of 5 residence is in the District of Utah. 1 The US Marshals Service effectuated the arrest on Thursday, February 2, 2023. Mr. Salt was remanded to the custody of the US Marshals Service. The Court understands that Mr. Salt is currently being held in the Salt Lake City county jail, and is set to be transported to the Southern District of New York starting tomorrow morning, February 23, 2023. The parties submitted letters to the Court (see ECF Nos. 272, 274, 275) and subsequently appeared before the Court at a conference on February 22, 2023 to discuss Jeffrey Salt’s intent to purge. After the conference, counsel for Mr. Salt indicated they obtained Mr. Salt’s agreement to the steps outlined in a proposal in Plaintiff’s letter, dated February 17, 2023 (ECF No. 275), for him to purge his contempt. Counsel provided Mr. Salt’s written note (appended to this Order), which he signs and dates, stating that he agrees to the following: (i) re-affirm the injunctive relief previously granted by the Court and agree to avoid interfering with Waterkeeper and its member/affiliate organizations’ business or activities going forward; (ii) demonstrate that he could not pay a fine; and (iii) vest the Court with ongoing jurisdiction for a period of time (e.g., 5 years) to enforce the consent order. Accordingly, the Court orders the following: The Court VACATES the warrant for Mr. Salt’s arrest and the order entered on January 22, 2020 (ECF No. 171); The Court ORDERS the release of Mr. Salt from the custody of the US Marshals Service, subject to any other warrants or outstanding detainers; Mr. Salt SHALL purge as he agreed to in his letter, as described above; The parties are DIRECTED to file a formal consent order reflecting Mr. Salt’s agreement to purge, as indicated hereto, within 7 days of Mr. Salt’s release from custody. In the consent On September 21, 2022, the Second Circuit, by summary order, affirmed the Court’s contempt orders and imposition of the imprisonment. (ECF No. 266.) 1 Case 7:10-cv-01136-NSR Document 277 Filed 02/22/23 Page 3 of 5 order, the parties are directed to provide a reasonable timeline by which Mr. Salt shall provide documentation regarding his inability to pay his contempt fines. Mr. Salt is reminded that he has agreed to vest the Court with ongoing jurisdiction to enforce his obligations to purge his contempt, as reflected in the Court’s prior orders. (See ECF Nos. 135, 160, 171, 250.) The Court warns that Mr. Salt may be subject to future orders of imprisonment should he fail to purge and comply pursuant to this Order and the forthcoming consent Order. The Court directs defense counsel to personally serve and deliver a copy of this order to Mr. Salt and show proof of service on the docket. Dated: February 22, 2023 White Plains, NY Case 7:10-cv-01136-NSR Document 277 Filed 02/22/23 Page 4 of 5 Case 7:10-cv-01136-NSR Document 277 Filed 02/22/23 Page 5 of 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?