Banks v. Astrue
ORDER ADOPTING R & R for 36 Motion for Attorney Fees filed by Martha Banks, 51 Report and Recommendations. It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's application for attorney's fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C § 2412(d) is granted in part, in the amount of $11,644.52, with the award to be made payable to Plaintiff's counsel. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending Motion. (Dkt. No. 36.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 9/6/2017) (anc)
UNITED STATES J;)ISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
No'. 10-CV-6462 (KMK) (JCM)
ORDER ADOPTING R&R
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, A<;:TINQ
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge:
On June 30, 2017, Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarth~ entered a Report&,
Recommendation (the "R&R") recommending that this Court ~rant in part Plaintiffs application
for attorney's fees. (R&R 10 (Dkt. No. 51).) In the thorough R&R, Judge McCarthy provided
notice that objections to the R&R were due within 14 days anq that failure to object would
preclude later appellate review of any order of judgment that
objections were filed.
vvill be entered.
(Id. at 10-11.) No
Because no objections have been filed, the Court reviews the R&R "only for clear error
on the face of the record." See Brennan v. Colvin, No. 13-CV~6338, 2015 WL 1402204, at *l
(S.D.N.Y. Mar. 25, 2015) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Iannalo v. Astrue, No. 10CV-7602, 2012 WL 523619, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 16, 2012) (s.ame). Having reviewed the R&R
for clear error and finding none, the Court adopts the R&R in i~s entirety.
Accordingly, it is hereby:
ORDERED that Plaintiffs application for attorney's fees pursuant to the Equal Access to
Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) is granted in part, in the amotµit of$11,644.52, with the award
to be made payable to Plaintiffs counsel. The Clerk of Court 1s respectfully requested to
terminate the pending Motion. (Dkt. No. 36.)
White Plains, New York
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?