United States of America v. United States Environmental Universal Services, Inc. et al

Filing 50

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge George A. Yanthis, dated April 22, 2013, (Doc. 47), recommending that the cross-claim of Defendant United States Environ mental Universal Services, Inc. ("USEUS") be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. No objections to the R&R have been filed, so I review it for clear error. No error, clear or otherwise, being apparent, the R&R is hereby adopted as the decision of the Court, and the cross-claim of USEUS is hereby dismissed with prejudice. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/13/2013) (lnl)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the use and benefit of National Development and Construction Corp., Plaintiff, -againstUNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL UNIVERSAL SERVICES, INC., PALONIA DEVELOPMENT & PRESERVATION SERVICES CO., LLC, and FIRST SEALORD SURETY, INC., ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 11-CV-730 (CS) Defendants. ---------------------------------------------------x Seibel, J. Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of Magistrate Judge George A. Yanthis, dated April 22, 2013, (Doc. 47), recommending that the cross-claim of Defendant United States Environmental Universal Services, Inc. (“USEUS”) be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. No objections to the R&R have been filed, so I review it for clear error. No error, clear or otherwise, being apparent, the R&R is hereby adopted as the decision of the Court, and the cross-claim of USEUS is hereby dismissed with prejudice. Dated: May 13, 2013 White Plains, New York ________________________ CATHY SEIBEL, U.S.D.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?