United States of America v. United States Environmental Universal Services, Inc. et al
Filing
50
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge George A. Yanthis, dated April 22, 2013, (Doc. 47), recommending that the cross-claim of Defendant United States Environ mental Universal Services, Inc. ("USEUS") be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. No objections to the R&R have been filed, so I review it for clear error. No error, clear or otherwise, being apparent, the R&R is hereby adopted as the decision of the Court, and the cross-claim of USEUS is hereby dismissed with prejudice. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/13/2013) (lnl)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------x
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for
the use and benefit of National
Development and Construction Corp.,
Plaintiff,
-againstUNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL
UNIVERSAL SERVICES, INC.,
PALONIA DEVELOPMENT &
PRESERVATION SERVICES CO.,
LLC, and FIRST SEALORD SURETY,
INC.,
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
11-CV-730 (CS)
Defendants.
---------------------------------------------------x
Seibel, J.
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of Magistrate Judge
George A. Yanthis, dated April 22, 2013, (Doc. 47), recommending that the cross-claim of
Defendant United States Environmental Universal Services, Inc. (“USEUS”) be dismissed with
prejudice for failure to prosecute. No objections to the R&R have been filed, so I review it for
clear error. No error, clear or otherwise, being apparent, the R&R is hereby adopted as the
decision of the Court, and the cross-claim of USEUS is hereby dismissed with prejudice.
Dated: May 13, 2013
White Plains, New York
________________________
CATHY SEIBEL, U.S.D.J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?