Federal Insurance Company et al v. Mertz, Jr. et al
Filing
220
OPINION & ORDER: Based on the parties' objections to the admissibility of the testimony of Sarah Brogan, the Court makes the following rulings, as set forth in this Order. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 4/25/2016) (mml)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
FEDERAL INSURANCE CO., GREAT
NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY, and
PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY,
Plaintiffs,
12-cv-1597-NSR-JCM
OPINION & ORDER
-against-
PAUL H. MERTZ, JR., THE MERTZ
COMPANY, and DENNIS SORGE,
Defendants.
NELSON S. ROMAN, United States District Judge
Based on the pmties' objections to the admissibility of the testimony of Sarah Brogan, the
Court makes the following rulings:
Page(s):Line(s)
43:2-11
44:23 to 45:5
58:2 to 62:22
Objection
Incomplete, ambiguous
Non-Responsive, move to
Asked and Answered
Ruling
N"ot Offered
N"ot Offered
58:2 -25 - Sustained; 62:4-22 - Sustained;
Overruled as to remaining lines
64:16 to 67:13
73:19 to 74:10
77:2-3
77:6-17
79:24 to 80:20
81:15-17
Objecting
Federal
Asked and Answered
Edit out as irrelevant
Irrelevant, incomplete,
Non-Responsive, move to
Non-Responsive, move to
Edit out as irrelevant
Overruled
N"ot Offered
Not Offered
Sustained
Not Offered
Sustained
USDCSDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC#:
DATE F-ยท E-. -y-11-.'2,-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?