Peterec v. Hilliard et al
Filing
45
ORDER: There are two motions to dismiss pending in this case. (Docs. 32, 35.) The memoranda of law submitted in connection with those motions are 17 and 13 pages, respectively. (Docs. 32, 35.) Plaintiff has filed two handwritten memoranda of law in o pposition. One is 100 pages long, (Doc. 42), and the other is 125 pages long, (Doc. 44), not counting attached exhibits. Plaintiff's handwriting seems to consumes about 11 lines per page, give or take. A typewritten page consumes approximately 2 4 lines per page. Plaintiff's 225 handwritten pages amounts to approximately 103 typewritten pages, well exceeding this Court's page limits for memoranda of law. See Individual Practices of Judge Cathy Seibel 2.B.i ("Unless prior permi ssion has been granted, memoranda of law in support of and in opposition to motions are limited to 25 pages... ) (available at www.nysd.uscourts.gov). Accordingly, Plaintiff's two memoranda of law, (Docs. 42, 44), are hereby stricken. Because P laintiff must respond to 30 pages of briefing by Defendants, I will permit him to file a single, 30-page typewritten brief responding to both motions, or a single, 65-page handwritten brief (with 11 lines per page) responding to both motions. As the previously filed briefs contain much duplicative material, this should not be too difficult a task for Plaintiff. Plaintiff may have until March 28, 2013 to do so. Defendants may reply by April 11, 2013. To summarize: 1. Documents 42 and 44 are hereb y STRICKEN. 2. Plaintiff may, by March 28, 2013, re-submit a single Memorandum of Law responding to both motions to dismiss. It shall not exceed 30 typewritten pages or 65 handwritten pages of 11 lines per page. 3. Defendants may reply by April 11, 2013. SO ORDERED. (Replies due by 4/11/2013) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/15/2013) The Clerks Office Has Mailed Copies. (lnl)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
----------------------------------------------------------------------x
JOHN L. PETEREC,
Plaintiff,
12-CV-3944 (CS)
- against ORDER
New York State Police Trooper SCOTT D. HILLIARD, et
al.,
Defendants.
----------------------------------------------------------------------x
Seibel, J.
There are two motions to dismiss pending in this case. (Docs. 32, 35.) The memoranda
of law submitted in connection with those motions are 17 and 13 pages, respectively. (Docs. 32,
35.) Plaintiff has filed two handwritten memoranda of law in opposition. One is 100 pages long,
(Doc. 42), and the other is 125 pages long, (Doc. 44), not counting attached exhibits.
Plaintiff’s handwriting seems to consumes about 11 lines per page, give or take. A
typewritten page consumes approximately 24 lines per page. Plaintiff’s 225 handwritten pages
amounts to approximately 103 typewritten pages, well exceeding this Court’s page limits for
memoranda of law. See Individual Practices of Judge Cathy Seibel 2.B.i (“Unless prior
permission has been granted, memoranda of law in support of and in opposition to motions are
limited to 25 pages . . . ) (available at www.nysd.uscourts.gov). Accordingly, Plaintiff’s two
memoranda of law, (Docs. 42, 44), are hereby stricken.
Because Plaintiff must respond to 30 pages of briefing by Defendants, I will permit him
to file a single, 30-page typewritten brief responding to both motions, or a single, 65-page
handwritten brief (with 11 lines per page) responding to both motions. As the previously filed
-1-
briefs contain much duplicative material, this should not be too difficult a task for Plaintiff.
Plaintiff may have until March 28, 2013 to do so. Defendants may reply by April 11, 2013.
To summarize:
1.
Documents 42 and 44 are hereby STRICKEN.
2.
Plaintiff may, by March 28, 2013, re-submit a single Memorandum of Law responding to
both motions to dismiss. It shall not exceed 30 typewritten pages or 65 handwritten
pages of 11 lines per page.
3.
Defendants may reply by April 11, 2013.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 15, 2013
White Plains, New York
________________________________
CATHY SEIBEL, U.S.D.J.
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?