Elavon, Inc. v. Northeast Advance Technologies Inc. et al
Filing
297
ORDER denying 292 MOTION for Reargument re: 291 Order on Motion for Leave to File Document. Denied. Plaintiff raises nothing new in its Motion for Reargument, and Plaintiff's original motions for reconsideration and to amend have already been decided by the Court. Plaintiff must submit its Third Amended Complaint by no later than January 20, 2020 and must include all claims it intends to bring therein. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 12/18/2019) (jca)
Case 7:15-cv-07985-KMK Document 292 Filed 12/05/19 r'age 1 or L
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Civil Action No.: 7:15-cv-7985-KMK-PED
ELAVON, INC.
Plaintiff,
V.
NORTHEAST ADVANCE TECHNOLOGIES,
INC., SAMUEL BRACH, JOSHUA BRACH,
ELIEZER KOHEN, ESTEBAN CASTILLO,
JOEL FRIEDMAN, RIVKY FRIEDMAN,
SILVERSTONE WIRELESS, LLC d/b/a J R
CLOSEOUTS, MOSHE KESTENBAUM, JOEL
FRIEDLANDER, MENACHEM WEISS,
HINDYWEISS, CUBITAC CORP., JOSEPH
RUBIN, DOVID KAPLAN, JOSHUA WEIDER,
HAVA REICHMAN, ALEX LOWY, D-TECH
MANAGEMENT COMPANY INC., JOHN
DOES 1-50 and ABC COMPANIES 1-50,
NOTICE OF MOTION FOR
PARTIAL REARGUMENT
Defendants.
To:
All Counsel of Record
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that counsel for plaintiff Elavon, Inc. ("Elavon"), on a date
and at a time to be set by the Court, shall move the Court to revise the Order entered on November
21, 2019 (the "Motion");
Case 7:15-cv-07985-KMK Document 292 Filed 12/05/19 Page LOT
L.
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that in support of the Motion, Elavon will rely on
the accompanying memorandum of law and Declaration of Daniel Ginzburg.
Dated: December 5, 2019
THE GINZBURG LAW FIRM, P.C.
Isl Daniel Ginzburg
By:
Daniel Ginzburg
Mailing Address
151 Highway 516, Unit 736
Old Bridge, New Jersey 08857
(732) 284-3841 (tel)
Counsel to Plaintiff Elavon, Inc.
Denied . PlO.\V\-\iff Y'Q\tirns fD ~
recon_9-ffuratt()(\ arcJ to O..m0t_d
ho.vt al r~
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?