Arriaga v. Gage et al

Filing 123

ORDER: The Court has been informed that the Parties have reached a settlement in principle in this case. Accordingly, it hereby ORDERED that this action is dismissed without costs and without prejudice to restoring the action to the Court' ;s calendar, provided the application to restore the action is made within forty-five (45) days of this Order. Any application to reopen filed after forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order may be denied solely on that basis. Any pending motions are DISMISSED as moot, and all conferences are CANCELED. SO-ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Philip M. Halpern on 8/25/2020) (va)

Download PDF
Case 7:16-cv-01628-PMH-LMS Document 123 Filed 08/25/20 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------X ANTHONY ARRIAGA, Plaintiff, v. DANA GAGE and C.O. ALVARADO, ORDER Defendants. ---------------------------------------------------------------X 16-cv-1628 (PMH) PHILIP M. HALPERN, United States District Judge: The Court has been informed that the Parties have reached a settlement in principle in this case. Accordingly, it hereby ORDERED that this action is dismissed without costs and without prejudice to restoring the action to the Court’s calendar, provided the application to restore the action is made within forty-five (45) days of this Order. Any application to reopen filed after forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order may be denied solely on that basis. Any pending motions are DISMISSED as moot, and all conferences are CANCELED. SO-ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York August 25, 2020 ____________________________ Philip M. Halpern United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?