Galgano v. County of Putnam, New York et al
Filing
650
ORDER: As such, it is hereby ORDERED that the communications between plaintiff and Jack Coker and between plaintiff and William Vega, Docket Nos.: 593-2 and 593-3, are not confidential attorney-client communications and are therefore outside the s cope of the Court's Order of September 20, 2018 and the Protective Order so ordered on June 7, 2018, DE 212;and It is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall unseal Docket Entries 593, 593-1, 593-2, and 593-3 in their entirety. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison on 10/12/2021) (ks) Transmission to Sealed Records Clerk for processing.
Case 7:16-cv"03572-KMK-PED
; i •; ^-••s--:.^1 i^i^hJV
H s ^S.^XJ ^J.JPii 'K
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
nOCUM^NT ,..,,,,„„, 11
II ^v •^r"rTiKY!^?fr!A'LI.Y FTI.Bn I!
-X
GEORGE GALGANO,
16-CV-
I i DATE HU^
"?
Plaintiff,
against -
COUNTY OF PUTNAM, NEW YORK;
TOWN OF CARMEL, NEW YORK;
ADAM LEVY; ANDRES GIL, LOURDES
GONZALEZ; HENRYLOPEZ; and
ORDER
MICHAEL T. NAGLE,
Defendants.
-X
This matter having come before the Court upon the motion of Defendants Adam Levy, Andres
Gil, Lourdcs Gonzalez, and Henry Lopez (the "ICDs ), Docket No.: 593, for an Order, inter alia,
declaring certain text messages to be outside the scope of the Court's Order of September 20, 2018
as well as the protective order governing this lawsuit. As such, it is hereby
ORDERED that the communications between plaintiff and Jack Coker and between
plaintiff and William Vega, Docket Nos.: 593-2 and 593-3, are not confidential attorney-client
communications and are therefore outside the scope of the Court s Order of September 20, 2018
and the Protective Order so ordered on June 7, 2018, DE 212;and It is furthcr
ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall unseal Docket Entries 593, 593-1, 593-2, and
593-3 in their entirety.
.SJ
^RDEREp;
^''
Hoh.Taul E. Davison,
U.S.M.J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?