Nuance Communications, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corporation

Filing 225

ORDER: AND NOW, this 13th day of February, 2020, it is hereby ORDERED that all the parties' objections to exhibits on the basis of relevance, foundation, and completeness are OVERRULED without prejudice. Objections to exhibits on the basis of hearsay will be decided when the exhibits are moved into evidence at trial. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Eduardo C Robreno on 2/13/2020) (jca)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Nuance Communications, Inc., Plaintiff v. International Business Machines Corporation, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-5173 ORDER AND NOW, this 13th day of February, 2020, it is hereby ORDERED that all the parties’ objections to exhibits on the basis of relevance, foundation, and completeness are OVERRULED without prejudice. 1 Objections to exhibits on the basis of hearsay will be decided when the exhibits are moved into evidence at trial. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Eduardo C. Robreno EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J. 1 Because this is a bench trial, and the Court will not use any evidence that is irrelevant, lacks foundation, or is incomplete as a basis for its findings of fact, it is appropriate to allow the exhibits to come into evidence subject to a motion to strike. See Bic Corp. v. Far E. Source Corp., 23 F. App'x 36, 39 (2d Cir. 2001) (“Further, the admission of evidence in a bench trial is rarely ground for reversal, for the trial judge is presumed to be able to exclude improper inferences from his or her own decisional analysis.”).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?