Vann v. Sudranski et al

Filing 153

ORDER denying 152 Letter Motion to Compel. Accordingly, the motion (Doc. #152) is DENIED. The discovery issues respecting the instant motion have already been considered and resolved. (See Doc. #135) ("In light of the response from the Assis tant Attorney General dated May 29, 2019, the undersigned is satisfied that Plaintiff has received that to which he is entitled. The request for further discovery in this regard is denied."). Moreover, the same issues were considered and resolv ed a second time during the July 30, 2019, pre-motion conference before the Court. During the conference, defense counsel notified the Court and plaintiff that the log book entries plaintiff seeks simply do not exist, nor did they at any time. Plaint iff is reminded that his opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment remains due November 29, 2019. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and the refore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk is instructed to terminate the motion (Doc. #152). The Clerk further is instructed to mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff at the address on the docket. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 11/12/2019) (mml) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.