Wilson v. HSBC Bank, USA et al

Filing 43

OPINION & ORDER: On July 11, 2017, Plaintiff submitted to the Court an Order to Show Cause for Default Judgment against Defendant Prudential Rand Realty, Inc. ("Prudential"). (See e.g., ECF No. 42.) Although Plaintiff is required to prov ide proof of service of both the Summons and Complaint upon Defendants, he has provided only affirmations of service of the Summons. (ECF No. 10.) Given Plaintiff has not demonstrated that he effectuated proper service upon Prudential, his Order to Show Cause is denied without prejudice to renew at a later date. Plaintiff is directed to present proof of service upon Prudential of both the Summons and Complaint. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 8/2/2017) Copies Mailed By Chambers(rj)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
SHERWIN WILSON,
Plaintiff,

-againstNo. 16-cv-8405 (NSR)
HSBC BANK, USA, MORTGAGEIT, INC.,
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION
SYSTEMS, INC., PRUDENTIAL RAND REALTY,
INC., ALL PERSONS AND ENTITIES WITH AN
INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4
WILLIAM STREET, OSSINING, NEW YORK, DOES
1-100,

OPINION & ORDER

Defendants.

NELSONS. ROMAN, United States District Judge
On July 11, 2017, Plaintiff submitted to the Court an Order to Show Cause for Default
Judgment against Defendant Prudential Rand Realty, Inc. ("Prudential"). (See e.g., ECF No. 42.)
Although Plaintiff is required to provide proof of service of both the Summons and Complaint
upon Defendants, he has provided only affirmations of service of the Summons. (ECF No. 10.)
Given Plaintiff has not demonstrated that he effectuated proper service upon Prudential, his Order
to Show Cause is denied without prejudice to renew at a later date. Plaintiff is directed to present
proof of service upon Prudential of both the Summons and Complaint.
Dated:

August ]-___, 2017
White Plains, New York

SO ORDERED:

Copie~~ ~I i,/io11~
Chambers ofNels?n S. Rom!\n, U.S.D.J.