Ellis v. The State of New York et al

Filing 156

ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Accordingly, Plaintiff's remaining claims are dismissed without prejudice, for failure to prosecute. See, e.g., Mena v. City of New York, No. 15-CV-3707, 2017 WL 6398728, at *2 (S.D.N. Y. Dec. 14, 2017) (noting that " ;a pro se plaintiff is not exempt from complying with court orders and must diligently prosecute his case"); Capogrosso v. Troyetsky, No. 14-CV-381, 2015 WL 4393330, at *5 (S.D.N. Y. July 17, 2015) (finding the fact that the plaintiff "h as not responded to efforts to contact her" weighs in favor of dismissal for failure to prosecute); Savatxath v. City of Binghamton, No. 12-CV-1492, 2013 WL 4805767, at* 1 (N.D.N.Y. Sept. 9, 2013) (dismissing case for failure to prosecute afte r the plaintiff" neglected to comply with an order...requiring him to notify the court...as to why th[e] action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute"); Smalls v. Bank ofN Y., Nos. 05-CV-8474, 07-CV-8546, 2008 WL 1883998, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 29, 2008) (dismissing case for failure to prosecute where the court received no communication from the plaintiffs for nearly two months); Robinson v. United States, No. 03-CV-1001, 2005 WL 2234051, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 8, 2005) (&qu ot;Only the Plaintiff can be responsible for notifying the court and the Defendant of his updated address, and Plaintiff's failure to do so has made it impossible to provide him any notice."). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff's last known address, and to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 7/31/2020) (jca) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.