Lowell v. Lyft, Inc.

Filing 324

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR TREATMENT OF CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS AT TRIAL...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material...SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Philip M. Halpern on 11/28/2022) (jca)

Download PDF
Case 7:17-cv-06251-PMH-AEK Document 324 inFiled 11/28/22 Page 1 ofPage 5 Case 7-17-cv-06251-PMH-AEK Document 321 Filed NYSD on 11/21/2022 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK HARRIET LOWELL and WESTCHESTER DISABLED ON THE MOVE, INC., individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, Case No. 7:17-cv-06251-PMH-AEK [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR TREATMENT OF CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS AT TRIAL Plaintiff, v. LYFT, INC., Defendant. Whereas, Lyft, Inc. (“Lyft”) has previously designated materials identified in Plaintiffs’ Exhibit List attached to the October 3, 2022 Joint Proposed Pretrial Order [Dkt. 312] as highly confidential pursuant to the Amended Stipulated Protective Order [Dkt. 67]; Whereas, Lyft contends that these materials, including multiple years of internal ride data, have significant competitive value and disclosure of the information would give an unfair advantage to Lyft’s competitors, both actual and potential; Whereas, following the Court’s guidance at the November 7, 2022 hearing, the Plaintiffs and Lyft (collectively, the “Parties”) have met and conferred regarding procedures to protect confidential information at trial and stipulate to entry of the following order; It is hereby ORDERED that the Court adopts the procedures set forth below governing the use of confidential material at trial: 1. Confidential Material: As used below, “Confidential” documents or information means those documents or information containing highly sensitive competitive business information that the parties believe in good faith are compliant with the precedent of, and would Case 7:17-cv-06251-PMH-AEK Document 324 inFiled 11/28/22 Page 2 ofPage 5 Case 7-17-cv-06251-PMH-AEK Document 321 Filed NYSD on 11/21/2022 2 of 5 survive scrutiny by, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. The parties recognize that there is a strong presumption of public access to judicial documents (such as those introduced into evidence at trial). See Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41 (2d Cir. 2019); Lugosch v. Pyramid Company of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). 2. Lodging of Confidential Voluminous Data Reports: The parties will not lodge with the court copies of voluminous data reports (including, but not limited to, those previously identified in Plaintiffs’ Exhibit List [Dkt. 312-1] as Exhibits 24-30 and 35-36) which were designated by Lyft as highly confidential, and instead will transmit slip-sheet placeholders of such materials. Parties shall have such materials accessible for inspection or presentation at trial on an as-needed basis. 3. Confidential Trial Exhibits: For purposes of presentation at trial, the parties will meet and confer regarding Trial Exhibits identified in the December 7, 2022 revised Joint Proposed Pretrial Order. A party who contends that certain exhibits should be treated as confidential at trial shall identify all such exhibits for opposing counsel no later than January 3, 2022. As needed, the Parties will then meet and confer regarding the propriety of the designation for the purposes of adhering to the procedures set forth below. Any unresolved issues regarding the confidentiality of trial exhibits will be raised with the Court prior to trial. 4. Confidential Deposition Designations: For purposes of presentation at trial, the parties will meet and confer regarding deposition designations identified in the December 7, 2022 revised Proposed Joint Pretrial Order. A party who contends designated testimony should be treated as confidential at trial shall identify that information for opposing counsel no later than January 3, 2022. As needed, the Parties will then meet and confer regarding presentation of designated deposition testimony for the purposes of avoiding disclosure of Confidential -2- Case 7:17-cv-06251-PMH-AEK Document 324 inFiled 11/28/22 Page 3 ofPage 5 Case 7-17-cv-06251-PMH-AEK Document 321 Filed NYSD on 11/21/2022 3 of 5 information at trial. Any unresolved issues regarding the confidentiality of designated material will be raised with the Court prior to trial. 5. Confidential Deposition Testimony: The following procedure shall be followed for deposition transcripts of any witnesses who will testify at trial: a. At least 72 hours before a witness who previously has been deposed is projected to testify, the party calling that witness shall inform the opposing party of its intent to call that witness. b. At least 48 hours before a witness identified pursuant to paragraph 5a above is expected to testify, the opposing party shall inform the party calling that witness of which, if any, portions of the witness’s deposition transcript they believe contain Confidential information that should not be published in the public record at trial. c. The parties will meet and confer to resolve any dispute regarding the propriety of the designation outside of hours reserved for trial testimony. 6. Presentation of Confidential Material at Trial: To the extent the parties do present Confidential information at trial, the following procedure will be used: a. The Parties have the right to elicit Confidential information at trial. However, to the extent possible, the parties will structure their witness examinations to minimize the elicitation of Confidential information during public sessions. For example, the parties will attempt to minimize references to specific figures in, or quoting from, Confidential materials. For any testimony reflecting Confidential information, Parties may move to seal and redact the information from the transcript and public record pursuant to paragraph 7. -3- Case 7:17-cv-06251-PMH-AEK Document 324 inFiled 11/28/22 Page 4 ofPage 5 Case 7-17-cv-06251-PMH-AEK Document 321 Filed NYSD on 11/21/2022 4 of 5 b. Prior to offering for display an exhibit with Confidential material, Parties will confer regarding limiting the display of material to the gallery. For an exhibit for which a Party seeks to limit display, counsel for that Party will seek leave of the Court to request that the Courtroom Deputy limit the visibility of evidence displayed on courtroom screens. A Party will only seek this limitation for narrowly tailored portions of materials for which good cause to seal exists. 7. Sealing of Confidential Material after Trial: Following trial, a party may file a motion to seal portions of the trial transcript or trial exhibits containing Confidential information. 8. Confidential Information Not Used At Trial: This Order governs documents, information, and deposition testimony that the Parties identify for use at trial. Any documents, information, and deposition testimony containing Confidential information not used at trial shall continue to be governed by the Amended Stipulated Protective Order. Dated: November 21, 2022 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Jiyun Cameron Lee Jiyun Cameron Lee (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Marie Jonas (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) FOLGER LEVIN LLP 199 Fremont Street, 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 415.625.1050 Facsimile: 415.625.1091 jlee@folgerlevin.com mjonas@folgerlevin.com Attorneys for Defendant Lyft, Inc. -4- Case 7:17-cv-06251-PMH-AEK Document 324 inFiled 11/28/22 Page 5 ofPage 5 Case 7-17-cv-06251-PMH-AEK Document 321 Filed NYSD on 11/21/2022 5 of 5 Dated: November 21, 2022 By: /s/ Jeremiah Frei-Pearson Jeremiah Frei-Pearson FINKLESTEIN, BLANKINSHIP FREI-PEARSON & GARBER LLP 1 North Broadway, Suite 900 White Plains, New York 10601 Telephone: 914.298.3281 Facsimile: 914.824.1561 jfrei-pearson@fbfglaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs Harriet Lowell and Westchester Disabled on the Move, Inc. FILER’S ATTESTATION I attest that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other Signatories. Dated: November 21, 2022 /s/ Jiyun Cameron Lee Jiyun Cameron Lee Dated: SO ORDERED. PHILIP M. HALPERN United States District Judge Dated: White Plains, New York November 28, 2022 1182857.1 -5-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?