Walker v. Odell et al

Filing 91

ORDER: The Court has been informed that the Parties have reached a settlement in principle in this case. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this action is dismissed without costs and without prejudice to restoring the action to the Court' s calendar, provided the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days of this Order. Any application to reopen filed after thirty (30) days from the date of this Order may be denied solely on that basis. Any pending motions are DISMISSED as moot, and all conferences are CANCELED. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion sequence pending at Doc. 90. (Signed by Judge Philip M. Halpern on 12/20/2021) (jca)

Download PDF
Case 7:17-cv-08120-PMH Document 91 Filed 12/20/21 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------X FLORENCE WALKER, Plaintiff, v. DR. CROSLEY O’DELL, Defendant. ---------------------------------------------------------X ORDER 17-cv-08120-PMH PHILIP M. HALPERN, United States District Judge: The Court has been informed that the Parties have reached a settlement in principle in this case. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this action is dismissed without costs and without prejudice to restoring the action to the Court’s calendar, provided the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days of this Order. Any application to reopen filed after thirty (30) days from the date of this Order may be denied solely on that basis. Any pending motions are DISMISSED as moot, and all conferences are CANCELED. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion sequence pending at Doc. 90. Dated: White Plains, New York December 20, 2021 ____________________________ Philip M. Halpern United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?