Voss v. Shulkin

Filing 102

ORDER granting 100 Letter Motion to Seal. Application granted. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to strike Doc. 98-38 from the docket but retain the summary docket text for the record. Plaintiff is directed to re-file a properly redacted version of the document by 5:00 p.m. on February 26, 2021. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion sequence pending at Doc. 100. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Philip M. Halpern on 2/24/2021) (ks)

Download PDF
[Type text] U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York 86 Chambers Street New York, New York 10007 Application 2021 February 22, granted. By ECF The Honorable Philip M. Halpern United States District Judge Southern District of New York 300 Quarropas Street White Plains, New York 10601 The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to strike Doc. 98-38 from the docket but retain the summary docket text for the record. Plaintiff is directed to re-file a properly redacted version of the document by 5:00 p.m. on February 26, 2021. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to Re: Voss v. McDonough, No. 17 Civ. 9015 (PMH) (JCM)1 motion sequence pending at Doc. terminate the 100. Dear Judge Halpern: SO ORDERED. RDERED. This Office represents Denis McDonough, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the _______________________ United States Department of Veterans Affairs (the “VA”) in the above-captioned matter. I write Philip M. Halpern respectfully pursuant to S.D.N.Y. Electronic Case Filing Rules &District Judge Part 21.7(b) to United States Instructions request that the Court seal Docket Entry 98-38 filed by Plaintiff, and order Plaintiff to file a properly redacted version of Docket Entry 98-38 within two business days of entry of an Order Dated: White Plains, New York February 24, 2021 granting this motion. On February 16, 2021, Plaintiff filed a document (Dkt. No. 98-38) in connection with his opposition to the VA’s motion for summary judgment that contains confidential or sensitive information, specifically the identity of the veteran who alleged that Plaintiff engaged in an inappropriate relationship with her while she was under his care while he was a Peer Support Specialist, exacerbating her PTSD. This document was marked confidential subject to the Protective Order entered in this matter. Further, on February 11, 2021, this Office asked Plaintiff’s counsel to ensure all of his summary judgment papers were properly redacted, and specifically identified this document as one that needed to be filed under seal given the confidentiality of the veteran’s identity. Although Plaintiff’s counsel attempted to redact the veteran’s identity, the redactions were transparent. Immediately upon Plaintiff’s filing of this document, this Office contacted the ECF Help Desk, which temporarily sealed Docket Entry 98-38. This Office also requested that Plaintiff’s counsel ask the Court to seal the document and file a properly redacted version of Docket Entry 98-38, but to date, Plaintiff’s counsel has not sought such relief from the Court. Accordingly, this Office respectfully requests that the Court formally seal Docket Entry 98-38, and order Plaintiff’s counsel to file a properly redacted version (i.e., opaque redactions) within two business days of entry of an Order granting this motion. 1 David Shulkin, M.D., who was named as defendant in his capacity as Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs, is no longer serving in that office. Secretary Denis McDonough, the current Secretary, was automatically substituted as defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d). Page 2 We thank the Court for its consideration. Respectfully submitted, AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York By: cc: Counsel of Record /s/ DANIELLE J. LEVINE ZACHARY G. BANNON Assistant United States Attorneys 86 Chambers Street, Third Floor New York, New York 10007 Tel.: (212) 637-2689/2728

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?