Vidurek et al v. Koskinen et al

Filing 44

OPINION AND ORDER re: 21 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Mary Madden, 8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Guy Chiarello, 5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Michael J. Quinn, 35 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint filed by Brenda Dial, Jeanette Willet, Maryellen Benecke, IRS, John/Jane Doe, J. Melendez, Linda Piack, John Koskinen. Defendant Quinn's motion to dismiss the complaint and for a filing injunction is GRANTED. Defendant Chiarello' s motion to dismiss the complaint is GRANTED. Defendant Madden's motion to dismiss the complaint is GRANTED. The Federal Defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint is GRANTED. The claims against defendants Schulman and Dorsey are DISMISSED sua sponte for insufficient service of process and otherwise as plainly without merit. The Clerk is directed to terminate the motions (Docs. ##5, 8, 21, 35) and close this case. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 7/25/2018) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (mml)