Murray v. The Dutchess County Department of Public Works et al

Filing 100

ORDER: Counsel for all parties appeared via telephone at 10:30 a.m. today. By November 5, 2021, Defendants are directed to provide Plaintiff with copies of the deposition transcripts identified during the conference that not have not yet been pr ovided to Plaintiff. Also by November 5, 2021, Plaintiff is directed to provide Defendants with copies of the deposition transcripts identified during the conference that have not yet been provided to Defendants. To the extent that any deposition transcript(s) is not available by November 5, 2021, such transcript(s) shall be provided as soon as it becomes available. In accordance with this Courts Individual Practice Rule 4.E., Defendants are directed to serve their Rule 56.1 Statement by December 3, 2021; Plaintiff is directed to respond to the 56.1 Statement in a single document, in compliance with the Court's Individual Practice Rule 4.E.iv., by December 20, 2021. Defendants are directed to file their pre-motion letter and Rule 56.1 Statement by December 22, 2021; Plaintiff is directed to file his letter in opposition by December 27, 2021. Plaintiff, should he be so advised, shall file his motion for class certification by December 3, 2021; Defendants shall file the ir opposition by December 17, 2021; Plaintiff shall file his reply by December 24, 2021. In light of Plaintiff's representation during the conference that he wishes to dismiss all claims against defendant James Dewitt, the parties are furthe r directed to file a proposed stipulation and order by November 5, 2021 dismissing defendant James Dewitt from this action. SO ORDERED. (Motions due by 12/3/2021., Responses due by 12/17/2021, Replies due by 12/24/2021.) (Signed by Judge Philip M. Halpern on 11/3/2021) (jca)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------X NELSON A. MURRAY, Plaintiff, v. ORDER 17-CV-09121 (PMH) DUTCHESS COUNTY EXECUTIVE BRANCH, et al., Defendants. ---------------------------------------------------------X PHILIP M. HALPERN, United States District Judge: Counsel for all parties appeared via telephone at 10:30 a.m. today. By November 5, 2021, Defendants are directed to provide Plaintiff with copies of the deposition transcripts identified during the conference that not have not yet been provided to Plaintiff. Also by November 5, 2021, Plaintiff is directed to provide Defendants with copies of the deposition transcripts identified during the conference that have not yet been provided to Defendants. To the extent that any deposition transcript(s) is not available by November 5, 2021, such transcript(s) shall be provided as soon as it becomes available. In accordance with this Court’s Individual Practice Rule 4.E., Defendants are directed to serve their Rule 56.1 Statement by December 3, 2021; Plaintiff is directed to respond to the 56.1 Statement in a single document, in compliance with the Court's Individual Practice Rule 4.E.iv., by December 20, 2021. Defendants are directed to file their premotion letter and Rule 56.1 Statement by December 22, 2021; Plaintiff is directed to file his letter in opposition by December 27, 2021. Plaintiff, should he be so advised, shall file his motion for class certification by December 3, 2021; Defendants shall file their opposition by December 17, 2021; Plaintiff shall file his reply by December 24, 2021. In light of Plaintiff’s representation during the conference that he wishes to dismiss all claims against defendant James Dewitt, the parties are further directed to file a proposed stipulation and order by November 5, 2021 dismissing defendant James Dewitt from this action. SO ORDERED: Dated: White Plains, New York November 3, 2021 ____________________________ Hon. Philip M. Halpern United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?