Murray v. The Dutchess County Department of Public Works et al

Filing 139

MEMO ENDORSED ORDER granting 138 Motion to Attach; granting 138 Motion to Seal; granting 137 Letter Motion to Seal. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. Exhibit J of Murray's Affirmation in Opposition and Exhibits 46 and 48a of Brown 9;s Affirmation in Opposition may be filed under seal. Plaintiff is directed to re-file Doc. 131 without the sealed Exhibit, so that the remainder of the filing is publicly available. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to: (1) strike Doc . 131 from the docket, but retain the docket text for the record; (2) seal Doc. 138 (and its attachments), permitting access only by the parties and the Court, but retaining the summary docket text for the record; and (3) terminate the motion sequences pending at Doc. 137 and Doc. 138. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Philip M. Halpern on 9/29/2022) (vfr)

Download PDF
Case 7:17-cv-09121-PMH Document 139 Filed 09/29/22 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------X NELSON A. MURRAY, Plaintiff MOTION TO SEAL (Medical Records) Civil Action No. 17-CV-09121 (PMH) v. DUTCHESS COUNTY, ROBERT BALKIND Commissioner Department of Public Works, in his individual capacity, MATTHEW DUTCAVICH an individual. Defendants. ------------------------------------------------------------------X Comes now plaintiff NELSON A. MURRAY, through counsel Deirdra J Brown, and requests leave to file under seal, pursuant to Rule 5(B) of the Court’s Individual Practices and Standing Order 19-mc-583, plaintiff’s Exhibits 46 and 48 of his already-served and contemporaneously filed opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgement. Plaintiff also seeks to have ECF Document #131-10 placed under seal (the “Documents”). Undersigned counsel hereby affirms that the Documents in question are medical records which are “routinely” filed under seal in the district courts of New York. See, e.g., Paravas v. Tran, No. 21 Civ. 807, 2022 WL 741590, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 11, 2022), quoting Whichard v. Doe, 2010 WL 3395288, at *7 (W.D.N.Y. Aug. 25, 2010)). Plaintiff seeks to file these medical records under seal to protect his privacy interest, as they reveal personal and detailed information about his mental health. Page 1 of 2 Case 7:17-cv-09121-PMH Document 139 Filed 09/29/22 Page 2 of 2 Counsel has conferred in good faith with opposing counsel, and this request is made with opposing counsel’s consent. The “Viewing Level” Plaintiff seeks for these Documents is the “Selected Parties” level, as per sections 6.5 and 6.9 of the Electronic Case Filing Rules & Instructions. Exhibit No. Description Exhibit 46 Progress Notes (Therapy) (Ogilvie) (April 2015 - June 2016) Exhibit 48 a Medical Report (09-23-21) (Dr. Clarfield) ECF # 131-10 Therapists Notes (aka Exhibit J of Murray’s Affidavit) Filed this the 28th day of September, 2022. 022. Poughkeepsie, New York ______________________________________ ____________________ THE LAW OFFICE OF D. JEN BROWN, PLLC Counsel for Plaintiff 272 Mill Street Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Application granted. Exhibit J of Murray's Affirmation in Opposition and Exhibits 46 and 48a of Brown's Affirmation in Opposition may be filed under seal. Plaintiff is directed to re-file Doc. 131 without the sealed Exhibit, so that the remainder of the filing is publicly available. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to: (1) strike Doc. 131 from the docket, but retain the docket text for the record; (2) seal Doc. 138 (and its attachments), permitting access only by the parties and the Court, but retaining the summary docket text for the record; and (3) terminate the motion sequences pending at Doc. 137 and Doc. 138. SO O ORDERED. _______________________ Philip M. Halpern United States District Judge Dated: White Plains, New York September 29, 2022 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?