Jackson v. Phoenix Transportation Service
Filing
56
ORDER: Accordingly, on or before March 3, 2021, Plaintiff is ordered to serve copies of (1) the Court's January 11 order (ECF No. 51), (2) his Proposed Finding of Fact & Conclusion of Law and pay stubs and checks attached thereto (ECF No. 52), (3) the Court's February 9 order (ECF No. 53), (4) his Declaration (ECF No. 54), (5) his Supplemental Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (ECF No. 55), and (6) this Order, upon Defendant Phoenix Transportation Service by mail at th e following addresses; as set forth herein. Plaintiff must then file proof of such service on the docket. In light of the foregoing, the Court hereby extends the time for Defendant Phoenix Transportation Service to serve and file its response, if any, to Plaintiff's inquest submissions, ECF Nos. 52, 54, and 55, to March 31, 2021., (Responses due by 3/31/2021, Service due by 3/3/2021.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause on 2/24/2021) (nb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
----------------------------------------------------------------------X
Walter Jackson,
Plaintiff,
ORDER
-against-
18 Civ. 3185 (CS)(AEK)
Phoenix Transportation Service, et al.,
Defendants.
----------------------------------------------------------------------X
THE HONORABLE ANDREW E. KRAUSE, U.S.M.J.
In response to the Court’s order of February 9, 2021, ECF No. 53, Plaintiff has filed:
(i) a new version of the document entitled “Proposed Finding of Fact & Conclusion of Law,”
ECF No. 52, with more legible copies of his paychecks; (ii) a sworn Declaration, ECF No. 54;
and (iii) a document docketed as “Supplemental Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
Law,” ECF No. 55, which appears to be the same as ECF No. 52, but without the photocopies of
paychecks, and which includes an Affirmation of Service and an explanation as to why Plaintiff
served his papers on “Silverman & Associates/Gary S. Smith” at 445 Hamilton Avenue, Suite #
1102, White Plains, New York 10601, see ECF No. 55 at 13-15. In essence, Plaintiff states that
this is the last known address of Defendant Phoenix Transportation Service and its counsel, and
that this was the address provided to him by Judge Seibel in her order docketed as ECF No. 44.
However, the aforementioned address is not the address listed in Judge Seibel’s order. Rather,
Judge Seibel’s order includes the following addresses for Defendant Phoenix Transportation
Service and its counsel:
Phoenix Transportation Services, Inc.
50 Main Street Suite 390
White Plains, NY 10606
1
Garvey & Associates, P.C.
235 Main Street Suite 630
White Plains, NY 10601
ECF No. 44. Plaintiff states that “[i]t should be noted that Garvey & Associates is the incorrect
name and Silverman & Associates is the correct one,” ECF No. 55 at 15, but he provides no
explanation for why or how he made this determination. The Court thus has no basis to conclude
that Plaintiff has effected proper service of his inquest papers upon Defendant Phoenix
Transportation Service.
Accordingly, on or before March 3, 2021, Plaintiff is ordered to serve copies of (1) the
Court’s January 11 order (ECF No. 51), (2) his “Proposed Finding of Fact & Conclusion of Law”
and pay stubs and checks attached thereto (ECF No. 52), (3) the Court’s February 9 order (ECF
No. 53), (4) his Declaration (ECF No. 54), (5) his “Supplemental Proposed Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law” (ECF No. 55), and (6) this Order, upon Defendant Phoenix Transportation
Service by mail at the following addresses:
Phoenix Transportation Services Inc.
50 Main Street, Suite 390
White Plains, NY 10606
and
Garvey & Associates, P.C.
235 Main Street, Suite 630
White Plains, NY 10601
Plaintiff must then file proof of such service on the docket.
2
In light of the foregoing, the Court hereby extends the time for Defendant Phoenix
Transportation Service to serve and file its response, if any, to Plaintiff’s inquest submissions,
ECF Nos. 52, 54, and 55, to March 31, 2021.
Dated: February 24, 2021
White Plains, New York
SO ORDERED.
___________________________________
ANDREW E. KRAUSE
United States Magistrate Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?