Turner v. Westchester County et al

Filing 120

ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Accordingly, this action is hereby DISMISSED pursuant to Rule 25(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendants must serve a copy of this Order upon Plaintiff's daughter at her email address, and must file proof of such service with the Court. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to serve a copy of this Order upon the pro se Plaintiff at his address of record on the docket. The Clerk of the Court is further respectfully directed to terminate all motions and close this case. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause on 1/25/2022) (tg) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.

Download PDF
Case 7:18-cv-03370-AEK Document 120 Filed 01/25/22 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------X Wilbert Kitson Andrew Turner, Plaintiff, -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL 18 Civ. 3370 (AEK) Dr. Raul Ulloa, et al., Defendants. -------------------------------------------------------------X THE HONORABLE ANDREW E. KRAUSE, U.S.M.J. On September 17, 2021, Defendants filed a “Suggestion of Death Upon the Record Pursuant to Rule 25(a)(1),” noting the death of pro se Plaintiff Wilbert Kitson Andrew Turner during the pendency of this action, and stating that the suggestion of death was “based upon the Suggestion of Death and Order of Dismissal filed and entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in Wilbert K.A. Turner v. Agent George Gjelaj, et al., Case No. 1:18-cv-01973-LTS-GWG.” ECF Nos. 113 & 114. 1 On September 20 , 2021, the Court issued an Order setting a December 27, 2021 deadline for an authorized representative of Plaintiff to move to substitute the proper party and setting a January 10, 2022 deadline for Defendants to file a letter motion to dismiss for failure to timely file a motion to substitute in the event that no action was taken by December 27, 2021. ECF No. 115. The September 20 Order also directed Defendants to serve copies of that Order on Plaintiff at the address set forth in the Order and on Plaintiff’s daughter, at the email address used by the parties for service of various 1 ECF Nos. 113 and 114 are virtually identical, except that at ECF No. 113, counsel attached a copy of this Court’s order at ECF No. 112 to the suggestion of death. Case 7:18-cv-03370-AEK Document 120 Filed 01/25/22 Page 2 of 2 documents on Ms. Turner in the Gjelaj matter. Defendants promptly effected such service. See ECF No. 116. Rule 25(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that: If a party dies and the claim is not extinguished, the court may order substitution of the proper party. A motion for substitution may be made by any party or by the decedent’s successor or representative. If the motion is not made within 90 days after service of a statement noting the death, the action by or against the decedent must be dismissed. (emphasis added). More than 90 days have passed since the service of a statement noting Plaintiff’s death, and no motion for substitution has been made. Defendants filed and served a letter motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 25(a) on January 10, 2022. ECF No. 118 (refiled at ECF No. 119). No opposition to the letter motion has been filed, nor has the Court received any other communication related to this action. Accordingly, this action is hereby DISMISSED pursuant to Rule 25(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendants must serve a copy of this Order upon Plaintiff’s daughter at her email address, and must file proof of such service with the Court. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to serve a copy of this Order upon the pro se Plaintiff at his address of record on the docket. The Clerk of the Court is further respectfully directed to terminate all motions and close this case. Dated: January 25, 2022 White Plains, New York SO ORDERED. ___________________________________ ANDREW E. KRAUSE United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?