Keebaugh v. International Business Machines Corp.

Filing 71

ORDER granting 70 LETTER MOTION for Discovery addressed to Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy from Matthew W. Lampe dated 5/8/2020. Document filed by International Business Machines Corporation. So ordered. The Clerk is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motion (Docket No. 70). (Signed by Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy on 5/11/2020) (rjm)

Case 7:18-cv-12126-CS-JCM Document 71 Filed 05/11/20 Page 1 of 2

250 VESEY STREET • NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10281.1047
TELEPHONE: [phone] • FACSIMILE: +1.212.755.7306
Direct Number: [phone]
[e-mail]

May 8, 2020
VIA ECF
The Honorable Judith C. McCarthy
U.S. Magistrate Judge, Southern District of New York
The Hon. Charles L. Brieant Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse
300 Quarropas St., White Plains, NY 10601-4105
Re:

Keebaugh v. IBM; No. 7:18-cv-12126 (CS) (JCM)

Dear Judge McCarthy:
As discussed during the May 6, 2020 telephone conference, the parties write jointly to
propose a schedule for the parties to bring any remaining document discovery disputes before the
Court and to request an extension on the current document discovery deadline, which is May 18,
2020. The parties propose the following schedule:
•

June 1, 2020 – Date by which the parties will conclude any meet and confer
discussions and identify what document discovery disputes remain to bring before
the Court.

•

June 4, 2020 – Deadline for parties to submit document dispute letters to the
Court. The parties will comply with Your Honor’s Discovery Order (Dkt. 41)
regarding discovery dispute letters and responses.

•

June 30, 2020 – Deadline for completion of document discovery. This deadline
does not apply to documents identified through deposition testimony.

•

Notwithstanding the above-referenced deadlines, the parties are permitted to bring
disputes to the Court after the June 1st discovery dispute deadline and June 30th
document discovery deadline if they do not receive by the document discovery
deadline documents that they reasonably expected to receive based on the
opposing party’s discovery responses or meet/confer discussions. Any such
disputes shall be brought to the attention of the Court in accordance with the
timing set forth in Your Honor’s Discovery Order.

•

All other dates in the April 7, 2020 Fourth Amended Civil Case Discovery Plan
and Scheduling Order (Dkt. 68) will remain the same.

ALKHOBAR • AMS TERDAM • ATL ANTA • BEIJING • BO S TON • BRISBANE • BRUSSEL S • CHICAGO • CLEVEL AND • CO LUMBUS • DALL AS

1068252 v1

DETROIT • DUBAI • DÜSSELDORF • FRANKFUR T • HONG KONG • HOUS TON • IRVINE • JEDDAH • LONDO N • LOS ANGELES • MADRID

MEXICO CIT Y • MIAMI • MIL AN • MINNEAPOLIS • MOSCOW • MUNICH • NEW YORK • PAR IS • PER TH • PITTSBURGH • RIYADH
SAN DIEGO • SAN FRANCISCO • SÃO PAULO • SHANGHAI • SILICON VALLEY • S INGAPORE • S YDNEY • TAIPEI • TOKYO • WASHINGTON

Case 7:18-cv-12126-CS-JCM Document 71 Filed 05/11/20 Page 2 of 2

Page 2

Should the Court need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Respectfully submitted,
s/ Matthew W. Lampe
Matthew W. Lampe
Cc: All counsel of record

SO ORDERED.
The Clerk is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motion (Docket No. 70).
Dated: New York, New York
May 11 2020
,
____________________________________
JUDITH C. MCCARTHY
United States Magistrate Judge

1068252 v1