Doe v. Sarah Lawrence College et al
Filing
56
ORDER. Plaintiff's motion for a protective order is sub judice. The Court has been parsing through the documents submitted in camera to determine the applicability of the psychotherapist-patient privilege. To assist the Court in its analysis, Pl aintiff is directed to submit under seal, by January 8, 2021, Bates-stamped versions of Exhibits B and C to its Memorandum of Law in Support of its Motion for Protective Order (Docket Nos. 47-2, 47-3). So ordered. re: 47 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion, filed by Jane Doe. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy on 1/7/2021) (rjm)
Case 7:19-cv-10028-PMH-JCM Document 56 Filed 01/07/21 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------X
JANE DOE,
Plaintiff,
-against-
ORDER
19 Civ. 10028 (PMH)(JCM)
SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE,
CRISTLE COLLINS JUDD, ALLEN GREEN,
DANIEL TRUJILLO, PAIGE CRANDALL,
and BEVERLY FOX,
Defendants.
------------------------------------------------------X
Plaintiff’s motion for a protective order is sub judice. The Court has been parsing
through the documents submitted in camera to determine the applicability of the
psychotherapist-patient privilege. To assist the Court in its analysis, Plaintiff is directed to
submit under seal, by January 8, 2021, Bates-stamped versions of Exhibits B and C to its
Memorandum of Law in Support of its Motion for Protective Order (Docket Nos. 47-2, 47-3).
Dated: January 7, 2021
White Plains, New York
SO ORDERED:
_______________________________
JUDITH C. McCARTHY
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?