Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. v. Insight Photonics Solutions, Inc.

Filing 20

MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: 19 Letter Stay filed by Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. ENDORSEMENT: The parties' request to lift the stay as of January 6, 2021 is GRANTED. Defendant may amend its answer on or before January 13, 2021. So Ordered. (Insight Photonics Solutions, Inc. answer due 1/13/2021.) (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 1/6/21) (yv)

Download PDF
Case 7:20-cv-07667-NSR Document 19 Filed 01/04/21 Page 1 of 1 20 01/06/21 1/6/2021 January 4, 2021 VIA ECF DANIEL P. GOLDBERGER Partner (212) 415-9365 Goldberger.dan@dorsey.com The parties' request to lift the stay as of January 6, 2021 is GRANTED. Defendant may amend its answer on or before January 13, 2021. The Honorable Nelson S. Román United States District Court Judge Southern District of New York 300 Quarropas Street White Plains, NY 10601 Dated: January 6, 2021 White Plains, NY Re: Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. v. Insight Photonic Solutions, Inc. Case No. 7:20-cv-7667 (NSR) Dear Judge Román: We represent Plaintiff Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. (“Zeiss”) in the above-referenced matter and write on behalf of both parties. We write to respectfully request that the Court lift the stay effected by the parties’ so-ordered Stipulation (Dkt. No. 18). The parties were unable to resolve their dispute within the Stay Period (as defined in the Stipulation) and, while the parties continue to work to resolve their dispute, intend to resume the lawsuit per the terms of the Stipulation. The parties ask that the stay be lifted as of January 6, 2021 and, consistent with paragraph 3 of the Stipulation, Insight shall have 7 days to amend its Answer as a matter of right up until January 13, 2021, to the extent it elects to do so. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Daniel P. Goldberger Daniel P. Goldberger cc: All Counsel of Record (via email) 51 West 52nd Street | New York, NY | 10019‐6119 | T 212.415.9200 | F 212.953.7201 | dorsey.com  4838-0038-8822\1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?