Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. v. Insight Photonics Solutions, Inc.
Filing
20
MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: 19 Letter Stay filed by Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. ENDORSEMENT: The parties' request to lift the stay as of January 6, 2021 is GRANTED. Defendant may amend its answer on or before January 13, 2021. So Ordered. (Insight Photonics Solutions, Inc. answer due 1/13/2021.) (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 1/6/21) (yv)
Case 7:20-cv-07667-NSR Document 19 Filed 01/04/21 Page 1 of 1
20
01/06/21
1/6/2021
January 4, 2021
VIA ECF
DANIEL P. GOLDBERGER
Partner
(212) 415-9365
Goldberger.dan@dorsey.com
The parties' request to lift the stay as of January 6, 2021 is GRANTED.
Defendant may amend its answer on or before January 13, 2021.
The Honorable Nelson S. Román
United States District Court Judge
Southern District of New York
300 Quarropas Street
White Plains, NY 10601
Dated: January 6, 2021
White Plains, NY
Re: Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. v. Insight Photonic Solutions, Inc.
Case No. 7:20-cv-7667 (NSR)
Dear Judge Román:
We represent Plaintiff Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. (“Zeiss”) in the above-referenced matter
and write on behalf of both parties. We write to respectfully request that the Court lift the stay
effected by the parties’ so-ordered Stipulation (Dkt. No. 18). The parties were unable to resolve
their dispute within the Stay Period (as defined in the Stipulation) and, while the parties continue
to work to resolve their dispute, intend to resume the lawsuit per the terms of the Stipulation.
The parties ask that the stay be lifted as of January 6, 2021 and, consistent with
paragraph 3 of the Stipulation, Insight shall have 7 days to amend its Answer as a matter of
right up until January 13, 2021, to the extent it elects to do so.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Daniel P. Goldberger
Daniel P. Goldberger
cc:
All Counsel of Record (via email)
51 West 52nd Street | New York, NY | 10019‐6119 | T 212.415.9200 | F 212.953.7201 | dorsey.com
4838-0038-8822\1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?