Salazar v. Cuetes Corp. et al

Filing 40

ORDER: In accordance with the Courts most recent Order, ECF No. 39, the parties were supposed to have filed their Cheeks submission, seeking approval of their settlement, by no later than December 3, 2021. Having received nothing, the Court conta cted counsel at the end of December and was informed that the parties would be seeking an additional extension of time so that they could file their Cheeks submission imminently. To date, the Court has still received nothing. Accordingly, the Court orders the parties to file either a request for a nunc pro tunc extension of time or their Cheeks submission by no later than Wednesday, January 12, 2022. So Ordered. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause on 1/10/2022) (js)

Download PDF
Case 7:20-cv-08167-AEK Document 40 Filed 01/10/22 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------X Salazar, ORDER Plaintiff, -against- 20 Civ. 8167 (AEK) Cuetes Corp., Defendant. -------------------------------------------------------------X THE HONORABLE ANDREW E. KRAUSE, U.S.M.J. In accordance with the Court’s most recent Order, ECF No. 39, the parties were supposed to have filed their Cheeks submission, seeking approval of their settlement, by no later than December 3, 2021. Having received nothing, the Court contacted counsel at the end of December and was informed that the parties would be seeking an additional extension of time so that they could file their Cheeks submission imminently. To date, the Court has still received nothing. Accordingly, the Court orders the parties to file either a request for a nunc pro tunc extension of time or their Cheeks submission by no later than Wednesday, January 12, 2022. Dated: January 10, 2022 White Plains, New York SO ORDERED. ___________________________________ ANDREW E. KRAUSE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?