Robb v. Brewster et al

Filing 28

ORDER denying 26 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. Plaintiff's application is DENIED. As the Court explained in its Memorandum Endorsement earlier today, Plaintiff's tardy submission of photographs was deficient because it was submitted 75 days after Plaintiff's deadline to submit opposition materials. (ECF No. 25.) The motion to dismiss has been fully briefed since April and, accordingly, the current request is untimely. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 6/3/2021) (vfr)

PAMELA GABIGER

Attorney at Law
P.O. Box 2952
Poughkeepsie, New York 12603
Facsimile: [phone]
Telephone: [phone]

0

ll.l
cs=::

Cl.)

0

Plaintiff's application is DENIED. As the Court explained in its
Memorandum Endorsement earlier today, Plaintiff's tardy submission of
photographs was deficient because it was submitted 75 days after Plaintiff's
deadline to submit opposition materials. (ECF No. 25.) The motion to
dismiss has been fully briefed since April and, accordingly, the current
request is untimely.

Q

Dated: June 3, 2021
White Plains, NY

�

JUNE 3, 2021

�

HON. NELSON ROMAN

SO ORDERED:

US DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NY
RE: JOSEPH ROBB

United States District Judge

7:20-CV-10521

DEAR JUDGE ROMAN:
I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST A BRIEF EXTENSION TO FILE PHOTOGRAPHS
OF JOSEPH ROBB'S INJURIES HE SUFFERED BY DEFENDANTS BEATING
HIM WITHOUT PROVOCATION IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS'
FRIVOLOUS MOTION TO DISMISS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION
TO THIS MATTER.
RESPECTFULLY YOURS,
SfPAMELA GABIGER

PAMELA GABIGER
USDCSDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC#:
DATE FILED: 6/3/2021