In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
Filing
237
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SANCTIONS denying (216) Motion for Sanctions in case 7:21-cv-07532-CM. Pro se appellant Ellen Isaacs, on Behalf of Patrick Ryan Wroblewski, filed a motion for sanctions against Davis Polk, dated November 25, 2021, seekin g $17 billion in sanctions. (Dkt. No. 216). Davis Polk filed a response to this motion on November 30, 2021. (Dkt. No. 232). For the reasons set forth in the Debtors' response (id.), the Court agrees that the motion is meritless and should be DENIED. The Clerk is directed to close the motion at Docket Number 216.. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 12/3/2021) BY ECF TO ALL PARTIES Filed In Associated Cases: 7:21-cv-07532-CM et al. (kv)
\,
USDCSDNY
',
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC#:
l
ยท
I
DATE FILED: I;r1 ~ c)J7 J--'I JIi
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
In re : PURDUE PHARMA
BANKRUPTCY APPEALS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X
This Filing Relates to
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _x
ALL MATTERS
21 cv 7532 (CM) [lead case]
[Rel: 21 cv 7585 (CM)
21 CV 7961 (CM)
21 CV 7962 (CM)
21 CV 7966 (CM)
21 CV 7969 (CM)
21 CV 8034 (CM)
21 cv 8042 (CM)
21 CV 8049 (CM)
21 CV 8055 (CM)
21 CV 8139 (CM)
21 CV 8258 (CM)
21 CV 8271 (CM)]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
McMahon, J.:
Pro se appellant Ellen Isaacs, on Behalf of Patrick Ryan Wroblewski, filed a motion for
sanctions against Davis Polk, dated November 25 , 2021 , seeking $17 billion in sanctions. (Dkt.
No. 216). Davis Polk filed a response to this motion on November 30, 2021. (Dkt. No . 232).
For the reasons set forth in the Debtors' response (id.) , the Court agrees that the motion is
meritless and should be DENIED.
The Clerk is directed to close the motion at Docket Number 216.
Dated: New York, New York
December 3, 2021
BY ECF TO ALL PARTIES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?