In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.

Filing 237

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SANCTIONS denying (216) Motion for Sanctions in case 7:21-cv-07532-CM. Pro se appellant Ellen Isaacs, on Behalf of Patrick Ryan Wroblewski, filed a motion for sanctions against Davis Polk, dated November 25, 2021, seekin g $17 billion in sanctions. (Dkt. No. 216). Davis Polk filed a response to this motion on November 30, 2021. (Dkt. No. 232). For the reasons set forth in the Debtors' response (id.), the Court agrees that the motion is meritless and should be DENIED. The Clerk is directed to close the motion at Docket Number 216.. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 12/3/2021) BY ECF TO ALL PARTIES Filed In Associated Cases: 7:21-cv-07532-CM et al. (kv)

Download PDF
\, USDCSDNY ', DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC#: l ยท I DATE FILED: I;r1 ~ c)J7 J--'I JIi - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re : PURDUE PHARMA BANKRUPTCY APPEALS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X This Filing Relates to _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _x ALL MATTERS 21 cv 7532 (CM) [lead case] [Rel: 21 cv 7585 (CM) 21 CV 7961 (CM) 21 CV 7962 (CM) 21 CV 7966 (CM) 21 CV 7969 (CM) 21 CV 8034 (CM) 21 cv 8042 (CM) 21 CV 8049 (CM) 21 CV 8055 (CM) 21 CV 8139 (CM) 21 CV 8258 (CM) 21 CV 8271 (CM)] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SANCTIONS McMahon, J.: Pro se appellant Ellen Isaacs, on Behalf of Patrick Ryan Wroblewski, filed a motion for sanctions against Davis Polk, dated November 25 , 2021 , seeking $17 billion in sanctions. (Dkt. No. 216). Davis Polk filed a response to this motion on November 30, 2021. (Dkt. No . 232). For the reasons set forth in the Debtors' response (id.) , the Court agrees that the motion is meritless and should be DENIED. The Clerk is directed to close the motion at Docket Number 216. Dated: New York, New York December 3, 2021 BY ECF TO ALL PARTIES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?