TIG Insurance Company et al v. Swiss Reinsurance America Corporation

Filing 80

ORDER TO SEAL granting 78 Letter Motion to Seal. It is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiffs' Motion to File Under Seal is hereby GRANTED. 2. Unredacted versions of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Rule 56.1 Statement of Und isputed Material Facts and their Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment are to be SEALED and otherwise protected from public disclosure. These documents are to be filed such that they are accessible only to th e Court and the parties to this case. 3. Versions of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts and their Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment that redac t any information quoted from the exhibits sealed by Order dated March 20, 2024 (ECF Doc. No. 77) are to be filed publicly. 4. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 78. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 3/25/2024) (va)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK TIG INSURANCE COMPANY, as successor to RANGER INSURANCE COMPANY, and ASSOCIATED ELECTRIC AND GAS INSURANCE SERVICES LIMITED, 3/25/2024 Case No.: 7:21-cv-08975-NSR-JCM ORDER TO SEAL Plaintiffs, v. SWISS REINSURANCE AMERICA CORPORATION F/K/A NORTH AMERICAN REINSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant. NOW, upon Plaintiffs’ motion requesting permission to file under seal unredacted versions of their Opposition to Defendant’s Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts and their Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiffs’ Motion to File Under Seal is hereby GRANTED. 2. Unredacted versions of Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts and their Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment are to be SEALED and otherwise protected from public disclosure. These documents are to be filed such that they are accessible only to the Court and the parties to this case. 3. Versions of Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts and their Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment that redact any information quoted from the exhibits sealed by Order dated March 20, 2024 (ECF Doc. No. 77) are to be filed publicly. 4. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 78. SO ORDERED. Dated: White Plains, New York March 25, 2024 ______________________ Nelson S. Román, U.S.D.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?