Jessamy v. Lamanna

Filing 43

ORDER re: 41 Letter, filed by Thomas L. Jessamy. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in this Court's previous Orders, Petitioner's application is denied without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending application (Docket No. 41) and mail a copy of this Order to the pro se Petitioner. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy on 8/1/2022) (vfr)

Download PDF
Case 7:21-cv-09242-NSR-JCM Document 43 Filed 08/01/22 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------X THOMAS JESSAMY, -against- Petitioner, ORDER 21 Civ. 9242 (NSR)(JCM) AMY LAMANNA, Superintendent, Respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------X On July 26, 2022, the Court received a letter from petitioner Thomas Jessamy (“Petitioner”) that appears to renew his previous requests for pro bono counsel and bail pending the Court’s decision on his petition for writ of habeas corpus. (Docket No. 41; see also Docket Nos. 13; 14; 30; 33). The Court denied these requests in orders dated February 22 and April 21, 2022 (the “Orders”). (Docket Nos. 18; 37). The Court has reviewed Petitioner’s renewed requests and does not find any change in circumstances in Petitioner’s case that would warrant the appointment of counsel or bail at this time. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in this Court’s previous Orders, Petitioner’s application is denied without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending application (Docket No. 41) and mail a copy of this Order to the pro se Petitioner. Dated: August 1, 2022 White Plains, New York SO ORDERED: _______________________________ JUDITH C. McCARTHY United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?