Bamonte et al v. Charatan
Filing
49
ORDER: For the reasons stated on the record at the May 10, 2022, hearing, Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and for an Order of Attachment, (Dkt. No. 22), is DENIED. Furthermore, the Temporary Restraining Order previously issued by the Court, (id.), is VACATED. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is due by no later than June 9, 2022. Plaintiffs' Response is due no later than July 11, 2022. Defendant's Reply is due by no later than July 27, 2022. The Parties are reminded to adhere to the Court's individual rules regarding page lengths in respective memoranda. SO ORDERED. ( Motions due by 6/9/2022., Responses due by 7/11/2022, Replies due by 7/27/2022.) (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 5/10/2022) (tg)
Case 7:22-cv-00795-KMK Document 49 Filed 05/10/22 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
CAROL BAMONTE, as Administrator of the
Estate of KATHLEEN DURST; and JAMES
MCCORMACK, VIRGINIA MCKEON, and
MARY HUGHES, as Co-Administrators of
the Estate of ANNE C. MCCORMACK, a
Distributee of the Estate of KATHLEEN
DURST,
No. 22-CV-795 (KMK)
Plaintiffs,
ORDER
v.
DEBRAH LEE CHARATAN, as the
Nominated Executor of the Estate of
ROBERT DURST,
Defendant.
KENNETH M. KARAS, United States District Judge:
For the reasons stated on the record at the May 10, 2022, hearing, Plaintiffs’ Motion for a
Preliminary Injunction and for an Order of Attachment, (Dkt. No. 22), is DENIED. Furthermore,
the Temporary Restraining Order previously issued by the Court, (id.), is VACATED.
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is due by no later than June 9, 2022. Plaintiffs’ Response
is due no later than July 11, 2022. Defendant’s Reply is due by no later than July 27, 2022.
The Parties are reminded to adhere to the Court’s individual rules regarding page lengths
in respective memoranda.
SO ORDERED.
DATED:
May 10, 2022
White Plains, New York
____________________________________
KENNETH M. KARAS
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?