Owens v. Orange County Jail et al

Filing 7

ORDER OF SERVICE: The Court dismisses Plaintiff's claims against Orange County Jail because it does not have the capacity to be sued. The Clerk of Court is directed to add Orange County as a Defendant under Fed. R. Civ. P. 21. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue summonses for Orange County and Imam Kedar, complete the USM-285 forms with the addresses for these defendants, and deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service. The Court dismisses Plaintiff's claims against E. Colby for failure to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). Chambers will mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff at the address on the docket. SO ORDERED. Orange County added. E. Colby (Shield #100) and Orange County Jail terminated. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 9/16/2022) (mml)

Download PDF
Case 7:22-cv-06487-VB Document 7 Filed 09/16/22 Page 1 of 7 Case 7:22-cv-06487-VB Document 7 Filed 09/16/22 Page 2 of 7 Case 7:22-cv-06487-VB Document 7 Filed 09/16/22 Page 3 of 7 Case 7:22-cv-06487-VB Document 7 Filed 09/16/22 Page 4 of 7 Case 7:22-cv-06487-VB Document 7 Filed 09/16/22 Page 5 of 7 Case 7:22-cv-06487-VB Document 7 Filed 09/16/22 Page 6 of 7 Case 7:22-cv-06487-VB Document 7 Filed 09/16/22 Page 7 of 7

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?