Wolfberg v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
18
ORDER: It having been reported to this Court that the claims in this case have been settled (as only to Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is discontinued with prejudice but without costs (as only to Defen dant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.); provided, however, that if settlement is not consummated within forty-five days of the date of this order, Plaintiff may apply by letter within the forty-five day period for restoration of the action to the Calendar of the undersigned, in which event the action will be restored. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. terminated. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/30/2024) (tro)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------------X
Wolfberg,
Plaintiff(s),
-against –
ORDER
7:24-CV-00421 (CS)
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al.,
Defendant(s).
-------------------------------------------------------------X
Seibel, J.
It having been reported to this Court that the claims in this case have been settled (as
only to Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action
is discontinued with prejudice but without costs (as only to Defendant JP Morgan Chase
Bank, N.A.); provided, however, that if settlement is not consummated within forty-five days of
the date of this order, Plaintiff may apply by letter within the forty-five day period for restoration
of the action to the Calendar of the undersigned, in which event the action will be restored.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 30, 2024
White Plains, New York
___________________________
CATHY SEIBEL, U.S.D.J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?