Hudson Neurosurgery, PLLC v. Archdioces of New York

Filing 33

ORDER granting in part 32 Letter Motion to Seal. Granted, to the extent Plaintiff is proposing to redact confidential information and not seeking to seal entire documents that might contain some confidential information. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 3/10/25) (yv)

Download PDF
Case 7:24-cv-03489-KMK Document 32 Filed 03/10/25 Page 1 of 1 Law Office Richard Hochhauser, PLLC 1225 Franklin Avenue, Suite 325 Garden City, NY 11550 RH@HochhauserLaw.com 516-939-1529 March 10, 2025 ByECF Hon. Kenneth M. Karas, U.S .D.J United States District Court for Southern District ofNew York The Hon. Charles L. Brieant Jr.Federal Building and United States Courthouse 3 00 Quarropas Street White Plains, New York 10601-4105 Re: Hudson Neurosurgery, PLLC v. Archdioces of New York Docket No.: 7:24-cv-03489-KMK Dear Judge Karas: This firm represent Plaintiff, Hudson Neurosurgery, PLLC in the above-referenced action. I write on behalf of the Plaintiff for the purposed of requesting that the Court permit the Plaintiff to file under seal, or redact, certain document relating to the Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment that contains the identify of the Patient. The Court granted a similar application on behalf of Defendant' s motion for summary judgment. Among the documents that the Plaintiff would propose to redact/seal would include the following : • • • Defendant's Exhibits in support, which include medical records from the Plaintiffs files. The deposition transcripts of Dr. Choudhri and the Plaintiffs staff. Communication between plaintiff and United Healthcare. We thank the court for its attention to this matter. Granted , to the extent Plaintiff is proposing to redact confidential information and not seeking to seal entire documents that might contain some confidential information. So rdered . 3/10/25 Respectfully submitted, Isl Richard Hochhauser Richard Hochhauser Partner Law office Richard Hochhauser, PLLC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?