Schultz v. Peekskill City School District

Filing 11

ORDER denying 10 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Denied in the absence of further explanation. Papers can be served electronically and/or by a third party. Therefore, the Court is at a loss to understand why there needs to be a 25-day adjournment of this conference. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 9/23/2024) (ks)

Case 7:24-cv-04601-KMK

Document 10

Filed 09/23/24

Page 1 of 1

STEWART LEE KARLIN LAW GROUP, P .C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
111 John Street, 22 nd Floor
New York, New York 10038
[phone]/Office
[phone]/Fax
[e-mail]
MEMBER OF THE BAR
NEW YORK & FLORIDA

Concentrating in Employment, Ed ucation, and
Insurance Law
Website: www.stewartkarlin.com

September 23 , 2024

Via SDNYECF
Honorable Kenneth M. Karas
United States District Judge
The Hon. Charles L. Brieant Jr.
Federal Building and United States Courthouse
300 Quarropas Street
White Plains, NY 10601-4150
Re:

Schultz v. Peekskill City School District
Case No: 24-cv-04601-KMK

Your Honor:
Plaintiff is writing this letter on consent to request an adjournment of the telephone conference in
the above-referenced case from October 3, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. to October 28, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. ,
or such a date that is convenient for ~e Court. The reason for the request is Plaintiffs papers_are
currently in the process of being served upon Defendant and Plaintiffs counsel will be traveling.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Denied in the absence of further explanation .
Papers can be served electronically and/or by a
third party. Therefore, the Court is at a loss to
understand why there needs to be a 25-day
adjournment of this conference.

Very truly yours,

sl Stewart Lee Karlin
Stewart Lee Karlin, Esq.

tf!!'dZ!(~
.

cc: All Counsel of Record via SDNY ECF.

9/23/24