Doe v. Marriott et al
Filing
8
ORDER Accordingly, the Court sua sponte extends Plaintiffs time to serve the summons and complaint on each Defendant to May 2, 2025. If, by May 2, 2025, Plaintiff has not either served Defendants or requested an extension of time to do so, the Court may dismiss this action for failure to prosecute. SO ORDERED. ( Service due by 5/2/2025.) (Signed by Judge Philip M. Halpern on 3/31/2025) (jca)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
JANE DOE,
Plaintiff,
ORDER
-against-
No. 24-CV-08027 (PMH)
MARRIOTT and MARRIOT OWNERSHIP
RESORTS,
Defendants.
PHILIP M. HALPERN, United States District Judge:
Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, paid the filing fees to commence this action. On
December 4, 2024, the Court issued an Order of Service directing Plaintiff to serve the summons
and complaint on each Defendant within 90 days of the issuance of the summonses. (Doc. 5). The
Court warned that failure to serve Defendants or request an extension of time to do so may result
in dismissal of the claims against Defendants under Rules 4 and 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure for failure to prosecute. (Id.). The Clerk of Court issued summonses as to Defendants
on December 13, 2024. (Doc. 6). No affidavits of service have been filed and there has been no
activity on the docket since then.
Accordingly, the Court sua sponte extends Plaintiff’s time to serve the summons and
complaint on each Defendant to May 2, 2025. If, by May 2, 2025, Plaintiff has not either served
Defendants or requested an extension of time to do so, the Court may dismiss this action for failure
to prosecute.
SO ORDERED.
Dated:
White Plains, New York
March 31, 2025
PHILIP M. HALPERN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?