West et al v. Goord et al

Filing 63

ORDER denying defendants' motion to dismiss, adopting Report and Recommendation re 62 directing that the U.s Marshal serve the remaining defendants and that defendants shall respond to the Second Amended Complaint. The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Scott for further proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 4/6/2012. (JMB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JAMES M. WEST, Plaintiff, ORDER 05-CV-447A v. GLENN GOORD, COMMISSIONER OF THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, et al., Defendants. The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge Hugh B. Scott, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Defendants filed a motion to strike and dismiss the Second Amended Complaint with prejudice. On February 15, 2012, Magistrate Judge Scott filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that the motion to dismiss be denied, that the remaining defendants be served, and that the defendants be directed to answer the complaint. The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Scott's Report and Recommendation, defendants' motion to dismiss is denied, the remaining defendants are to be served and the defendants shall answer the complaint. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve the remaining defendants in this case. The defendants are directed to respond to the Second Amended Complaint. The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Scott for further proceedings. SO ORDERED. s/ Richard J. Arcara HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATED: April 6, 2012

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?