Amaker et al v. Goord et al
Filing
303
ORDER granting 221 Motion ; granting 224 Motion ; granting 228 Motion to Compel; granting 228 Motion ; denying 229 Motion to Expedite; denying 229 Motion ; denying 254 Motion ; denying 255 Motion for Hearing; denying 283 Motion ; de nying 283 Motion to Expedite; denying 283 Motion to Enforce Judgment; denying 284 Motion ; denying 285 Motion. Sanctions are imposed against defendants in the amount of $19,600. The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Schroeder for further proceedings. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 10/3/2012. (JMB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
ANTHONY D. AMAKER,
and
RUHULLAH HIZBULLAH,
Plaintiffs,
ORDER
06-CV-490A
v.
COMMISSIONER GLENN S. GOORD,
et al.,
Defendants.
_______________________________________
GEORGE FLUELLEN,
Plaintiff
v.
COMMISSIONER GLENN S. GOORD,
et al.,
Defendants.
The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge H. Kenneth
Schroeder, Jr., pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On August 16, 2012 , Magistrate
Judge Schroeder filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that plaintiff
Amaker's motions for contempt (Dkt. ##221, 224 and 228) be granted, that sanctions
be imposed against defendants in the amount of $19,600 and that the remainder of
plaintiff Amaker's motions for contempt (Dkt. ##229, 254, 255, 2823284 & 285), be
denied.
The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the
record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties. Although
plaintiff initially filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation,
he subsequently filed a statement with the Court withdrawing those objections (Dkt.
#302). Therefore, it is hereby
ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons
set forth in Magistrate Judge Schroeder’s Report and Recommendation, plaintiff
Amaker's motions for contempt (Dkt. ##221, 224 and 228) are granted, the court
imposes sanctions against defendants in the amount of $19,600 and the remainder of
plaintiff Amaker's motions for contempt (Dkt. ##229, 254, 255, 283, 284 & 285), are
denied.
The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Schroeder for further
proceedings.
SO ORDERED.
s/ Richard J. Arcara
HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DATED:October 3, 2012
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?