Astolos v. Barnhart

Filing 16

ORDER granting 5 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying 7 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; adopting Report and Recommendation re 13 . Clerk of Court to close case. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 10/14/2009. (JMB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W E S T E R N DISTRICT OF NEW YORK S H E R Y L L. ASTOLOS, Plaintiff, v. ORDER 06-CV-678 MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, D e fe n d a n t. T h is case was referred to Magistrate Judge Leslie G. Foschio, pursuant to 2 8 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), on April 11, 2007. On March 6, 2007, both plaintiff and d e fe n d a n t filed motions for judgment on the pleadings. On July 22, 2008, M a g is tra te Judge Foschio filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending th a t defendant's motion be granted and that plaintiff's motion be denied. P la in tiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation on August 5, 2 0 0 8 and the defendant filed a response thereto. Oral argument on the o b je c tio n s was held on October 8, 2009. P u rs u a n t to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court must make a de novo d e te rm in a tio n of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which o b je c tio n s have been made. Upon a de novo review of the Report and R e c o m m e n d a tio n , and after reviewing the submissions and hearing argument from the parties, the Court adopts the proposed findings of the Report and R e c o m m e n d a tio n . Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Foschio's Report a n d Recommendation, defendant's motion is granted and plaintiff's motion is d e n ie d . T h e Clerk of Court shall take all steps necessary to close the case. SO ORDERED. s/ Richard J. Arcara HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DATED: October 14, 2009 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?