Anson v. United States of America et al

Filing 76

ORDER affirming Magistrate Judge's Order 74 on Motion to Appoint Counsel. Case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Schroeder for further proceedings. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 4/22/2010. (JMB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W E S T E R N DISTRICT OF NEW YORK D O N A L D JAMES ANSON, P la in tiff, v. ORDER 07-CV-035A UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, D e fe n d a n t. T h is case was referred to Magistrate Judge H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr., p u rs u a n t to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). O n F e b r u a r y 2 , 2 0 1 0 , p l a i n t i f f file d a n a p p l i c a t i o n fo r a p p o i n t m e n t o f co u n s e l . O n M a r c h 2 3 , 2 0 1 0 , M a g i s t r a t e Ju d g e S c h r o e d e r file d a D e c i s i o n a n d O r d e r , d e n y i n g p l a i n t i f f 's a p p l i c a t i o n . O n A p r i l 1 3 , 2 0 1 0 , pla i n t i f f file d a n a p p e a l o f M a g i s t r a t e Ju d g e S c h r o e d e r 's d e c i s i o n . P u r s u a n t to 2 8 U . S . C . § 6 3 6 ( b ) ( 1 ) ( A ) , th e district co u r t "m a y r e c o n s i d e r a n y pre t r i a l m a t t e r u n d e r th i s [se c t i o n ] w h e r e it h a s b e e n s h o w n th a t th e m a g i s t r a t e 's o r d e r is cle a r l y e r r o n e o u s o r co n t r a r y to la w . " T h e C o u r t ha s re v i e w e d p l a i n t i f f 's a p p e a l an d M a g i s t r a t e Ju d g e S c h r o e d e r 's D e c i s i o n a n d O r d e r . U p o n such revie w a n d a f t e r h e a r i n g a r g u m e n t fro m co u n s e l , th e C o u r t fin d s th a t M a g i s t r a t e Jud g e S c h r o e d e r 's D e c i s i o n a n d O r d e r is n e i t h e r cle a r l y e r r o n e o u s no r co n t r a r y to la w . A c c o r d i n g l y , th e C o u r t a f f i r m s th e D e c i s i o n a n d O r d e r . SO ORDERED. s/ Richard J. Arcara HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATED: April 22, 2010 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?