Brown v. PLP, II et al

Filing 75

DECISION AND ORDER denying 43 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendation re 62 . Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 9/12/2011. (JMB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W ESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BARBARA BROW N, Plaintiff, DECISION AND ORDER 07-CV-312A v. PLP, II, and JOSEPH D. PALERMO, Defendants. The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr., pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On June 9, 2011, Magistrate Judge Schroeder filed a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 62), recommending that defendants’ motion for summary judgment be denied. Defendants filed objections to the Report and Recommendation on July 25, 2011. Plaintiff filed a response to defendants’ objections on August 9, 2011. Defendants filed reply papers on August 15, 2011. The Court has deemed the matter submitted on papers pursuant to Rule 78(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. Upon a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation, and after reviewing the submissions, the Court adopts the proposed findings of the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Schroeder’s Report and Recommendation, defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 43) is denied. The parties are directed to appear before the Court on Friday, September 23, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. for a status conference to set a trial date. SO ORDERED. s/ Richard J. Arcara HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATED:September 12, 2011 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?