Securities and Exchange Commission v. Watermark Financial Services Group, Inc. et al

Filing 232

ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 231 Motion for Disbursement of Funds to Pay Tax Obligations and Fees of the Tax Administrator. Signed by William M. Skretny, Chief Judge on 3/29/2013. - CLERK TO FOLLOW UP AS SPECIFIED in ORDER. - (MEAL)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. ORDER 08-CV-361S WATERMARK FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC., ET AL., Defendants. IT HEREBY IS ORDERED, that for good cause shown, Plaintiff’s Motion for Disbursement of Funds to Pay Tax Obligations and Fees of the Tax Administrator (Docket No. 231) is GRANTED. FURTHER, that the Clerk of Court shall issue a check on the Court Registry Account under the case name designation “SEC v. Watermark Financial” in the amount of $2,931, payable to “Damasco and Associates, Trust Account,” for the payment of the tax obligations set forth in the Tax Payment Declaration (Docket No. 231-2). The check shall contain the notation “2008-2012 tax payment” and have federal tax identification number “XX-XXX5470" (on file with the Court) written on it. FURTHER, that the Clerk of Court shall issue an additional check on the Court Registry Account payable to “Damasco & Associates” for the payment of fees and expenses of the Tax Administrator as set forth in the Fee Request Declaration (Docket No. 231-3.) The check shall contain the notation “Tax Administrator Fees from inception through March 14, 2013." 1 FURTHER, that the Clerk of Court shall send the checks by overnight mail to the following address: Damasco & Associates LLP 700 Monte Vista Lane Half Moon Bay, CA 94019 FURTHER, that Plaintiff’s counsel shall provide the Clerk of Court with an overnight shipping form billing the shipment to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. Dated: March 29, 2013 Buffalo, New York /s/William M. Skretny WILLIAM M. SKRETNY Chief Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?