Rickard v. Western New York Independent Living Project, Inc.

Filing 13

AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. CERLK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO VACATE JUDGEMENT ENTERED ON MAY 26, 2009 AND THE MATTER IS REF3ERRED BACK TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE SCHROEDER FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 5/29/2009. (JMB) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/2/2009: # 1 amended) (JMB).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W ESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MICHAEL W. RICKARD, II, Plaintiff, AMENDED ORDER 08-CV-674A v. W ESTERN NEW YORK INDEPENDENT LIVING PROJECT, INC., Defendant. The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge H. Kenneth S c h ro e d e r, Jr., pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On April 30, 2009, Magistrate Judge Schroeder filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint be granted. The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Schroeder's Report and Recommendation, defendant's motion to dismiss (1) plaintiff's allegations concerning violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act contained in plaintiff's first cause of action; (2) plaintiff's third cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress; and (3) plaintiff's fourth cause of action for breach of an implied employment contract is granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to vacate judgment entered on May 26, 2009, and the matter is referred back to Magistrate Judge Schroeder for further proceedings. SO ORDERED. s/ Richard J. Arcara HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DATED: May 29 , 2009

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?