Bundy v. Astrue

Filing 16

ORDER granting 8 defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings and adopting Report and Recommendation re 13 . Clerk of Court to close case. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 11/19/2010. (JMB)

Download PDF
Bundy v. Astrue Doc. 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W E S T E R N DISTRICT OF NEW YORK R O Y S. BUNDY, Plaintiff, v. ORDER 09-CV-702 MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, C O M M IS S IO N E R OF SOCIAL SECURITY, D e fe n d a n t. T h is case was referred to Magistrate Judge Leslie G. Foschio, pursuant to 2 8 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), on October 15, 2009. On March 12, 2010, defendant filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings and on May 13, 2010 plaintiff filed a m o tio n for judgment on the pleadings. On September 8, 2010, Magistrate Judge F o s c h io filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that defendant's m o tio n should be granted and that plaintiff's motion should be denied. P la in tiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation on September 2 1 , 2010 and the government filed a response thereto. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), this Court must make a de novo d e te rm in a tio n of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which o b je c tio n s have been made. Upon a de novo review of the Report and R e c o m m e n d a tio n , and after reviewing the submissions, the Court adopts the p ro p o s e d findings of the Report and Recommendation. Dockets.Justia.com Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Foschio's Report a n d Recommendation, defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is g ra n te d and plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied. The Clerk o f Court shall take all steps necessary to close the case. SO ORDERED. s/ Richard J. Arcara HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATED: November 19, 2010 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?