Robinson v. Viscuso et al
Filing
59
-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-ORDER appointing Beverly Braun, Esq. pro bono counsel. Signed by Hon. H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr on 4/8/2014. (KER)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
LATEE ROBINSON,
Plaintiff,
-vs-
10-CV-326A(Sr)
VISCUSO, Prison Guard, et al.,
Defendants.
DECISION AND ORDER
By Order entered September 30, 2013, the Court granted defendants’
motion for summary judgment except with respect to plaintiff’s claim that Corrections
Officers Hill and Hibsch used excessive force against plaintiff at the Five Points
Correctional Facility on April 20, 2009. Dkt. #45, pp.15-17 & Dkt. #50. The parties
subsequently consented to jurisdiction by the undersigned, who scheduled this matter
for trial by jury commencing June 24, 2014. Dkt. ##57-58.
This Court is required to see that all litigants receive proper
representation of counsel under the criteria set forth in Cooper v. A. Sargenti Co., 877
F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1989), and Hodge v. Police Officers, 802 F.2d 58 (2d Cir. 1986). In
addition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), courts have the inherent authority to
assign counsel to represent indigent litigants.
More importantly, each lawyer - especially those who are admitted to
practice in federal court and who therefore are in a position to reap the benefits of such
practice - has an ethical obligation under the Code of Professional Responsibility to
provide pro bono services for the poor. New York Code of Professional Responsibility,
Canon 2, EC 2-16; EC 2-25. “Every lawyer, regardless of professional prominence or
professional workload, should find time to participate in serving the disadvantaged.” EC
2-25. In addition, Rule 83.1(g) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure provides as
follows:
Every member of the bar of this Court shall be available
upon the Court’s request for appointment to represent or
assist in the representation of indigent parties.
Appointments under this rule shall be made in a manner
such that no attorney shall be requested to accept more
than one appointment during any twelve month period.
It is in this spirit that the Court assigns Beverly Braun, Esq., Associate,
Jaeckle Fleischmann & Mugel, LLP 200 Delaware Avenue, Suite 900, Buffalo, NY
14202-2107, pro bono, to faithfully and diligently represent plaintiff in this case.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to provide Ms. Braun a copy of this
Order and the Guidelines Governing Reimbursement from the District Court Fund of
Expenses Incurred by Court Appointed Counsel. This information and the forms are
also available on the Court’s web site at the Attorney Information link from the home
page located at: www.nywd.uscourts.gov. The Chief Judge of the Court will also issue
-2-
an Order directing PACER to waive its fees so pro bono counsel can access and print
at no cost to her or her firm any other documents filed herein that she may need.
SO ORDERED.
DATED:
Buffalo, New York
April 8, 2014
s/ H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr.
H. KENNETH SCHROEDER, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?