Ceglia v. Zuckerberg et al
DECLARATION signed by Terrance P. Flynn re 95 Cross MOTION to Compel, 91 MOTION to Compel Defendant Zuckerberg's Compliance with the Court's Order of July 1, 2011 filed by Mark Elliot Zuckerberg, Facebook, Inc. filed by Mark Elliot Zuckerberg, Facebook, Inc.. (Snyder, Orin)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
PAUL D. CEGLIA,
TERRANCE P. FLYNN
MARK ELLIOT ZUCKERBERG, Individually,
and FACEBOOK, INC.
Civil Action No.:
I, TERRANCE P. FLYNN, ESQ., hereby declare under penalty of perjury that the following
is true and correct:
I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of New York and am admitted to
practice before this Court. I am a partner in the law firm Harris Beach PLLC, counsel of record for
Defendants Mark Elliot Zuckerberg and Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”) in the above-captioned matter.
I make this declaration, based on personal knowledge, in opposition to Plaintiff’s motion and in
support of Defendants’ cross-motion.
On July 15, 2011, I spoke directly in person with Jeffrey Lake, Esq. in a conference
room at my firm’s law offices, 726 Exchange Street, Suite 1000, Buffalo, New York. During that
conversation, I informed Jeffrey Lake, Esq. that the defendants would be providing the Declarations
of Mark Elliot Zuckerberg and Alexander Southwell, Esq. to him that day pursuant to the Court’s
Order, dated July 1, 2011.
I also explained to Mr. Lake that the Local Rules of the Western District of New York
do not require the filing of such Declarations with the Court and therefore they would not be filed.
Mr. Lake understood and did not object to my statements.
The aforementioned Declarations of Mark Elliot Zuckerberg and Alexander
Southwell, Esq. were subsequently provided to Mr. Lake after our conversation later that day on
July 15, 2011.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on this
4th day of August, 2011 in Buffalo, New York.
Terrance P. Flynn
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?