Amaker v. Bradt et al
ORDER directing service of the Summons and Amended Complaint upon additional defendants. Signed by Hon. H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr on 9/30/2011. (KER)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
MARK L. BRADT, Supt., et al.,
DECISION AND ORDER
This case was referred to the undersigned by the Hon. Richard J. Arcara in
an order dated April 26, 2011, for all pretrial matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A)
and (B) and for report and recommendation on dispositive motions pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§§ 636(b)(1)(B) and (C). (Docket No. 11.)
Plaintiff, Anthony Amaker, appearing pro se and having been granted
permission to proceed in forma pauperis, has filed an amended complaint in which he
names a number of additional defendants who were not named in the complaint. (Docket
No. 17, § 1B, Caption, Continued, p.8.) Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to
cause the United States Marshal to serve copies of the Summons and Amended
Complaint, and this Order upon the additional defendants named in the amended
complaint--C.O. Piadlo, Dept. S. Dolce, C.O. D. Adamy, C.O. Bust, Capt. K. Brown, C.O.
A. Steck, Sgt. Cunningham, Sgt. D. Leonard, C.O. J. Hendzel, Nurse Cygren, Nurse
Sharpe and D. O’Connors--without plaintiff's payment therefor, unpaid fees to be
recoverable if this action terminates by monetary award in plaintiff's favor.
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2), the defendants are directed to respond to the
Buffalo, New York
September 30, 2011
s/ H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr.
H. KENNETH SCHROEDER, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?