Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. Border Trading Co., Inc.

Filing 11

ORDER FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation against Border Trading Co., Inc. Signed by William M. Skretny, Chief Judge U.S.D.C. on 12/12/2011. (CMD)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. BORDER TRADING CO., INC. as Plan Administrator of the Border Trading Co., Inc. Pension Plan, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 11-CV-727S ORDER FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT THE COURT having reviewed the Motion for Default Judgment of Plaintiff Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”) against Defendant Border Trading, Co. Inc. (“Border Trading”) and the supporting Memorandum, and the Clerk having entered a Default with respect to Defendant on October 21, 2011, and good cause having been shown therefore, it is, by the Court, ORDERED: That Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (Docket No. 8) is GRANTED and a judgment by default is entered in favor of PBGC under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2); and it is FURTHER ORDERED: That the Border Trading Co., Inc. Pension Plan (the “Pension Plan”) is terminated pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1342(c); and it is FURTHER ORDERED: That August 15, 2008, is established as the termination date of the Pension Plan under 29 U.S.C. § 1348(a)(4); and it is FURTHER ORDERED: That PBGC is appointed as statutory trustee of the Pension Plan under 29 U.S.C. § 1342(c); and it is FURTHER ORDERED: That Defendant or any other person having possession, custody, or control of any records, assets, or other property of the Pension Plan shall transfer, convey, and deliver all such records, assets, and property to PBGC; and it is FURTHER ORDERED: That the Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case. SO ORDERED. December 12, 2011. Buffalo, New York s/William M. Skretny WILLIAM M. SKRETNY Chief Judge United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?