Canales v. Southport Correctional Facility et al

Filing 41

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION denying as moot Defendants' 24 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Scott for further proceedings consistent with the September 22, 2015 Text Order Referring case issued by United States District Judge Richard J. Arcara. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on 3/25/2016. (Copy of Order mailed to Plaintiff). (CMD)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ________________________________________ LUIS A. CANALES, Plaintiff, ORDER v. 12-CV-693-V M. SHEAHAN, et al., Defendants. ________________________________________ On September 22, 2015, United States District Judge Richard J. Arcara referred this case to Magistrate Judge Hugh B. Scott, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). See Docket Item 29. On February 9, 2016, Magistrate Judge Scott filed a Report and Recommendation, and a Decision and Order (Docket Items 32 and 33), granting the plaintiff’s cross-motion to amend the complaint and recommending that the defendants’ motion to dismiss be denied as moot. The case was transferred from Judge Arcara to the undersigned on March 7, 2016. See Docket Item 35. This Court has reviewed the file, including the Report and Recommendation. No objections have been timely filed. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons explained in Magistrate Judge Scott’s careful and detailed Report and Recommendation, the defendants’ motion to dismiss is denied as moot. The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Scott for further proceedings consistent with the September 22, 2015 Text Order Referring Case issued by United States District Judge Richard J. Arcara. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Lawrence J. Vilardo LAWRENCE J. VILARDO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: March 25, 2016 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?