Oney v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 19

-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-ORDER denying 12 defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; granting 13 plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; adopting Report and Recommendation re 18 . Case is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings. Clerk of Court to close case. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 9/30/2013. (JMB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK TERRILEE ONEY, Plaintiff, ORDER 12-CV-872A v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge Hugh B. Scott, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On September 10, 2013, Magistrate Judge Scott filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that the decision of the Commissioner be reversed and the matter remanded for further administrative proceedings. In addition, the Magistrate Judge recommended that defendant Commissioner’s motion for judgment on the pleadings be denied and plaintiff’s motion for similar relief in her favor be granted. The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Scott’s Report and Recommendation, the decision of the Commissioner is reversed and the matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. In addition, defendant Commissioner’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied and plaintiff’s motion for similar relief in her favor is granted. The Clerk of Court shall take all steps necessary to close the case. SO ORDERED. s/ Richard J. Arcara HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATED:September 30, 2013

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?