Obot v. Internal Revenue Service

Filing 11

-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-ORDER granting 2 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying 5 Motion to Amend or Correct; adopting Report and Recommendation re 10 . Clerk of Court to close case. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 10/16/2013. (JMB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OTU A. OBOT, Plaintiff, v. ORDER 12-CV–1053 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendants. The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge Leslie G. Foschio pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On September 26, 2013, Magistrate Judge Foschio filed a combined Report and Recommendation and Decision and Order (Dkt. No. 10) recommending that defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction be granted and that pro se plaintiff Otu A. Obot's motion seeking leave to file an amended complaint be denied. The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation and Decision and Order (Dkt. No. 10), the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Foschio’s Report and Recommendation and Decision and Order, defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is granted and plaintiff's motion seeking leave to file an amended complaint is denied. The Clerk of Court shall take all steps necessary to close the case. SO ORDERED. s/ Richard J. Arcara HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATED: October 16, 2013 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?